Tamil Nadu

Ariyalur

RBT/CC/153/2022

P.Kesavan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Renuka Business Holding and Development Private Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

M.Abdul razack

21 Oct 2022

ORDER

                                                                                                                                     Complaint taken on file:14.02.2017

     Order delivered on: 21.10.2022

 

BEFORE THE HON´BLE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALCOMMISSION, ARIYALUR

      PRESENT:

Dr.V.Ramaraj M.L, P.hd : President

Mr.N.Balu B.A, B.L : Member - I

                                                   Mrs.V.Lavanya B.A., B.L :Member - II

Consumer Complaint (RBT) No.153/2022

Friday, the twenty first day of October, 2022

 

1.         Mr. P.Murali, S/o., K.M.Pachanathan, Flat No: 3-B, & 4-B, third Floor, IX th Block, Ceebros Apartments, Old No: 6, New No: 1, Dr.Radha KrishnanSalai, Palaniyappa Nagar, Valasaravakkam,Chennai – 600 087.

 

2.         Mr. P.Keavan, S/o., M.A.Padmanaban, Flat No: If, third Floor, IV th Block, Ceebros Apartments, Old No: 6, New No: 1, Dr.Radha KrishnanSalai, Palaniyappa Nagar, Valasaravakkam,Chennai – 600 087.

 

                                                                                                            ...           Complainants

1.Renuka Business Holding and Development Pvt Ltd,

Corporate Office: II/25, Instronics Campus,

Dr VSI Estate,SHANTAM 4^th floor,

Taramani – Velachery  100 feet road,

Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai,

Rep.by its Managing Director.

2.  Cushman & Wakefield (India) Pvt Ltd.,

No: 471, Prestige Polygon Towers,

6^th Floor, Anna Salai,

Teynampet,

Chennai,

Rep. by its Managing Director.

 

3.   Prestige Estates Projects Ltd.

Corporate Office:

The ‘Fllcon House’,

No 1 Main Guard Cross Road,

Bangalore,

Rep. by its Managing Director.                                   ...         Opposite Parties

 

Counsel for Complainant: Mr.M. Abdul Razack

Counsel for First opposite Party: M/s. Dua Asssociates, Advocates

Counsel for Second opposite Parity: M/s. SDS. Philip, Advocates

 

On perusal of records in this case, we delivered the following

ORDER

Pronounced by  Dr.V.Ramaraj: President and adopted by Members

 

1.     The Complainant has filed this case as against the Opposite Parties and marked 11 exhibits and first and second opposite parties filed written version.  The opposite first party set expartie.

 

 

2.         In these   circumstances, parties filed a joint compromise memorandum dated 20^th September, 2022.  It is recorded. The above said memorandum is part and parcel of this order.  As per the above memorandum, third opposite party paid Rs.3,28,500/- to the complainants by two  cheques and the complainants agreed to withdraw the complaint unconditionally.. 

As result this Commission passes the following ORDER:

The complaint is dismissed as settled out of the commission.

 

This Order was dictated by me to the steno today the 21st day of October, 2022, was taken notes in short-hand and then typed in computer and corrected by him and was pronounced by us in the open court today.

 

 

                                                                                                            President

 

 

                                                                                                            Member - I

 

 

                                                                                                            Member -II