Haryana

StateCommission

A/1607/2017

MOHIT MODGILL - Complainant(s)

Versus

RENAULT INDIA PVT.LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MANINDER JEET SINGH

22 Feb 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA,PANCHKULA

                                                 

First Appeal No.1607 of 2017

Date of Institution: 27.12.2017

                                                          Date of Decision: 22.02.2018

 

Mohit Modgill S/o Sh.K.K.Modgill, r/o H.No.171, Sector-4, Panchkula 134112.

     …..Appellant

                                                Versus

 

1. Renault India Private Ltd. ‘Plot No.11,3^rd floor, Sector-32, Institutional Area Gurgaon 122002 through its Managing Director.
2. NCR Motors India Pvt. Ltd., 70, Sohna Road, Sector-48, Gurgaon-122004, through its Managing Director.
3. PMG Autos Pvt. Ltd., 47, Industrial Area Phase 1, Chandigarh 160002, through its Managing Director.
4. Anand Auto Tech Private Ltd., Aggarwal Warehouse compound, Village Bithauli Sitapur road, Lucknow-22600, through its Managing Director.

         …..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr. R.K.Bishnoi, Judicial Member.
                   Mrs. Urvashi Agnihotri, Member.

 

Present:-    Mr.Mr.M.J.S.Cheema, Advocate counsel for appellant.

 

                                      O R D E R

 

R.K.BISHNOI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

 

          Appellant filed complaint before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurugram (In short “District Forum”) for replacing of the car and other relief as mentioned in the complaint because there was manufacturing defect.

2.      After hearing learned counsel for complainant the same was dismissed vide impugned order dated 04.12.2017 because the vehicle was not in his name.

3.      Feeling aggrieved therefrom, complainant has preferred this appeal.

4.      Arguments heard. File perused.

5.      The vehicle is in the name of VE commercial vehicles limited, whereas the complaint is filed by Mr. Mohit Modgill. As he is not owner of the vehicle he is not having any right to file complaint against respondent because there is no relationship of consumer and service provider in between them.  The findings of learned District Forum are well reasoned based on law and facts and cannot be disturbed.  Resultantly, appeal fails and the same is hereby dismissed in limine.

 

February 22nd, , 2018	Urvashi Agnihotri Member Addl.Bench		R.K.Bishnoi, Judicial Member Addl.Bench
S.K