Kerala

Trissur

CC/14/242

Prabhakaran - Complainant(s)

Versus

Renault India Pvt Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

V A Ajay

30 May 2014

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
AYYANTHOLE
THRISSUR-3
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/242
( Date of Filing : 08 May 2014 )
 
1. Prabhakaran
-
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Renault India Pvt Ltd.
-
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SHEENA V V MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. M P Chandrakumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:V A Ajay, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 30 May 2014
Final Order / Judgement

    23rd day of May 2014

                                     C.C.242/14  filed on 8/5/14

 

Complainant:        Prabhakaran, Kariyezhath House, Perinjanam Desom,

                             Thrissur.

                             (By Adv.V.A.Ajay, Thrissur., Thrissur)

 

Respondents:        1. Renolt India Pvt. Ltd., Head Office, S.V.Ramana

                                 Tower, 4th floor, Venkattanarayana Road T Nagar,

                                 Chennai.

                             2. Show Room Manager, T.V.Sundaram Iyenkar &

                                 Sons Ltd., Vyttila Jn., Cochin.

                             3. Show Room Manager, TVS & Sons Ltd., Bypass,

                                 Mannuthy.

                             4. MRF Ltd., Pannivelil Bldgs., Menonpara Road,

                                 Kanjikode, Palakkad.

 

                                      O R D E R

By  Smt.Padmini Sudheesh, President :

          Heard on admission and rejected.  It is seen that there is no territorial jurisdiction to this Forum to entertain the case.  The vehicle was purchased from 2nd respondent which is in Ernakulam.  3rd respondent is made party to file the complaint before this Forum.

 

          2. Petitioner submitted that the defect of tyres is due to the  deficiency in service of 3rd respondent. But it is seen  not so as per averments in the complaint.  As per Section 11(2) of Consumer Protection Act this Forum lacks territorial jurisdiction.  Hence the complaint is returned and petitioner is directed to take back the file to approach proper Forum.

         

 

            Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum this the   23rd  day   of May       2014.

 

                                                                     Sd/-                                                                                       Padmini Sudheesh, President.

            Sd/-

                                                          Sheena.V.V, Member.

            Sd/-

                                                          M.P.Chandrakumar, Member

 

                             Appendix

                                  Nil

 

                                                                Id/-

                                                          President

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SHEENA V V]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. M P Chandrakumar]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.