Jagninder Singh filed a consumer case on 11 Apr 2023 against Religare Health Insurance Company Ltd in the Fatehgarh Sahib Consumer Court. The case no is CC/227/2020 and the judgment uploaded on 26 Jun 2023.
Punjab
Fatehgarh Sahib
CC/227/2020
Jagninder Singh - Complainant(s)
Versus
Religare Health Insurance Company Ltd - Opp.Party(s)
Sh Harpreet Singh Bhutta
11 Apr 2023
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION
FATEHGARH SAHIB.
Consumer Complaint No.
:
CC/227 of 2020
Date of Institution
:
02.11.2020
Date of Decision
:
11.04.2023
Jagninder Singh aged about 64 years son of son of Sh. Rattan Singh resident of House no.68, Sun City colony , Khamanon, District Fatehgarh Sahib.
…………....Complainant
Versus
Religare Health Insurance Company Limited, Branch office: GTB Market, Khanna, Tehsil Khanna, District Ludhiana through its branch Manager.
Religare Health Insurance Company Limited, 3rd Floor, Roa Mother Singh Complex, Vipul Tech Square Tower, Golf Course Road, Sector 43,Gurugram-122009 (Haryana) through its authorized signatory/M.D
Punjab National Bank, Branch officer : Ludhiana- Chandigarh Road, Khamanon, Tehsil Khamanon, District Fatehgarh Sahib through its Branch Manager
..………....... Opposite Parties
Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019
Quorum
Sh. S.K. Aggarwal, President
Ms. Shivani Bhargava, Member
Sh. Manjit Singh Bhinder, Member
Present: Sh.Harpreet Singh Bhutta, counsel for complainant.
Sh.Amit Gupta, Counsel for OPs no.1 and 2
OP no.3 Ex-Parte vide order dated 25.2.2021
The complaint has been filed against the OPs (opposite parties) under Section 34 of Consumer Protection Act-2019 alleging deficiency in service with the prayer for giving direction to the OPs to pay Rs.2,24,279/- as insurance claim, to pay Rs.1,00,000/- on account of mental agony and litigation expenses.
The complainant purchased a health insurance Policy from OPs in 2018 through Punjab National Bank. The complainant was issued a health insurance Policy namely Group Care PNB bearing Policy no.11561922 with certificate Insurance no.12853658 covering the complainant and his spouse with effect from 12.8.2018 till 11.8.2019 for sum insured of Rs.5,00,000/- subject to policy terms and conditions. The Policy was again renewed from 12.8.2019 till 11.8.2020. On 16.6.2020 , the complainant suffered heaviness, pain in chest and was admitted in Gracian hospital, Mohali and discharged on 18.6.2020. The complainant paid Rs.2,24,279/- to the said hospital . Thereafter, the complainant got lodged the Medical claim with the OPs for reimbursement. The OPs repudiated the claim vide letter dated 28.7.2020. Hence this complaint.
Notice of the complaint was given to the OPs through registered Post OPs no.1 and 2 appeared through their Counsel and filed written version. OP no.3 did not appear despite service of summons as such OP no.3 was proceeded against Ex-Parte for non appearance vide order dated 25.02.2021.
The complaint has been contested by the OPs and they filed written version jointly by raising preliminary and legal objections. Written version was filed on behalf of Care Health Insurance Ltd formerly known as Religare Health Insurance Co. Ltd. The complainant approached the OPs no.1 and 2 for reimbursement of claim . The OPs raised a query vide letter dated 16.7.2020 and asked to provide the requisite documents and the complainant provided the same. Upon perusal of the medical documents as provided by the complainant, it came to the light that the complainant is suffering from Type 2 diabetes (DM). It is specifically mentioned in the policy that any claim arising out of Hypertension and Diabetes shall not be admissible during 24 consecutive months from the cover start date. Therefore, the OPs rejected the claim vide letter dated 28.7.2020. Hence, prayer for dismissal of complaint with cost has been made.
The complainant in support of his complaint tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex.CW1/1, and Photo copies of documents i.e ExC1 certificate of insurance no.12853658, Ex.C2 Member ID card, ExC3 and Ex.C4 premium acknowledgement , Ex.C5 Discharge slip, Ex.C6 payment receipts, Ex.C7 claim denial letter dated 28.7.2020, Ex.C8 legal notice dated 21.9.2020, Ex.C9 and Ex.C10 postal receipts. In rebuttal the OPs tendered Ex.OP1/A affidavit of Sahil Chauhan , Legal Manager, Care Health Insurance, Gurgaon, Ex.OP1 free lock period letter along with terms and conditions, Ex.OP2 letter dated 14.8.2019 of renewal of certificate of Insurance no.12853658, Ex.OP3 letter dated 17.8.2020 , Ex.OP4 receipt of hospital , Ex.OP5 claim form , Ex.OP6 discharge slip of hospital, Ex.OP7 medical bill , Ex.OP8 medical reports of Lab., Ex.OP9 letter dated 16.7.2020, Ex.OP10 letter dated 16.7.2020 along with record, Ex.OP11 claim denial letter, Ex.OP12 legal notice, Ex.OP13 reply of legal notice and closed their evidence.
Heard. Entire record has been perused.
From the perusal of the record on file, we find that complainant spent Rs.2,24,279/ on his treatment vide Ex.C6. The Ops repudiated the claim on the ground that complainant is suffering from Type 2 diabetes (DM) and there is 2 years waiting period for DM , HTN and its related complication vide Ex.OP11. Complainant suffered all of sudden chest pain and pain in both shoulders. Complainant got admitted in hospital on 16.6.2020. Cardiologist performed angioplasty on same day and stent was inserted to remove the blockage from the heart vessels vide Ex.C5. It is not a hard and fast rule that every person having Mellitus-II diabetes would necessarily suffer from a cardiac disease. There was no evidence let in by the Ops to show that Diabetes Mellitus type-II was the cause of the heart surgery . There was no proximity between heaviness in chest & Diabetes. If the insured suffers a sudden sickness or ailment which is not expressly excluded under the Policy , a duty is cast on the insurer to indemnify the insured there under . Insurance Company rejected his claim on the ground that any claim arising out of hypertension and diabetes shall not be admissible during 24 consecutive months from the cover start date. On 16 June , 2020, complainant got done his heart surgery and waiting period of 2 years as mentioned in Policy completed on 11 August, 2020. Insurance Companies should not be hyper technical while deciding the claim. Insurance Company rejected his claim just before one & half month of completion of 2 years of his Policy. Rejection of claim purely on technical ground will result in Policy holder’ loosing confidence in Insurance Companies and giving rise the excessive litigation. Insurance companies should not reject genuine claims . Repudiation of claim was wholly unwarranted and devoid of any merit. Therefore, OPs no.1 and 2 are held liable for deficiency in service. OP no.3 is Proforma OP.
As a corollary of our above discussion, the present complaint is partly allowed. Therefore, OPs no.1 and 2 i.e care Health Insurance Co. Ltd. formerly known as Religare Health Insurance Co. Ltd. are directed as under:-
[a] To pay jointly and severally Rs.2,24,279/- to the complainant along with interest@ 6% P.A from the date of filing of complaint within 30 days, failing which interest @ 9% P.A. shall be payable.
[b] ComplianceTo pay Rs.15,000/-compensation for harassment and litigation charges to the complainant.
Compliance of the order be made by the OPs no.1and 2 within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Failing which the complainant shall be entitled to recover the above said amount through legal process. The complaint could not be decided within the statutory period due to pandemic of Covid-19 and paucity of staff. Copy of this order be sent to the complainant and the OPs as per rules. File be consigned to record Room.
Pronounced 11 April 2023
(S.K. Aggarwal)
President
(Shivani Bhargava)
Member
( Manjit Singh Bhinder )
Member
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.