ORDER BY HON’BLE PRESIDENT- MR. P.K. PADHI:

                                                                                                   JUDGMENT

            Counsels for both parties are absent. Notices to opposite parties were sent but no written versions have been filed and opposite parties have been set ex-parte on 05.12.2017. Matter was heard and reserved for order to 12.3.2018 by our predecessors on 23.02.2018 but order was not pronounced. Fresh notice was issued to complainant on 22.5.2023 but none appeared for the complainant.

            Matter relates to banker and customer who has failed to pay the dues and the vehicle for which there was loan has already been seized on 16.01.2012 and auctioned when demand notice was issued on 22.7.2016 from the complainant, he has filed the present C.C. No.115/2016 and 118/2016. Thus complainant being owner of multiple vehicle and cannot be said as a consumer and the dispute relate to contractual dispute and there is no deficiency in service by the financier as such no case is made out under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  As such the consumer complaint is dismissed. No cost.

            Pronounced in the open Commission on this 21^st Sept.,2023.