7. So, from the entire unrebutted and unchallenged evidence produced by the complainant on record, it stands fully proved on record that the Opposite Party has failed to provide the services to the Complainant despite receipt of its consideration i.e. Rs.499/- as per bank detail Ex.C7 through which the Complainant has paid the amount of Rs.499/- directly to the account of Opposite Party on 05.03.2018. Further as argued above by the ld.counsel for the complainant that the Complainant has been harassed badly all the time without any reasonable cause and requested to refund the price and to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation for causing him mental tension and harassment and Rs.5,000/- as litigation expenses. But however, the claim for compensation to the tune of Rs.15,000/- is concerned, the same appears to be exorbitant and excessive. The rationale behind grant of compensation has been to compensate a party of the loss occasioned by it. It is none of the intention of the legislature while legislating the Consumer Protection Act to enrich a particular party at the cost of the other. The compensation has to be awarded in commensuration with the loss occasioned to the complainant. In our considered view, ends of justice would be fully met if the complainant is awarded lump-sum compensation to the tune of Rs.3,000/- and we award the same accordingly.
8. In views of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we allow the complaint of the complainant against the Opposite Party and the Opposite Party is directed to refund the amount of Rs.499/- alongwith interest @ 8% per annum from the date of its deposit i.e. 05.03.2018 till its actual realization. The Opposite Party is also directed to pay Rs.3,000/- as lumpsum compensation to the complainant. Compliance of this order be made by the Opposite Party within 45 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, failing which the Complainant shall be at liberty to get the order enforced through the indulgence of this Commission. Copies of the orders be furnished to the parties free of cost. File is ordered to be consigned to the record room.
9. Reason for delay in deciding the complaint.
This complaint could not be decided within the prescribed period because the government has not appointed any of the two Whole Time Members in this Commission since 15.09.2018. Moreover, the President of this Commission is doing additional duties at District Consumer Commission, Faridkot. There is only one working day in a week when the quorum of this Commission remains complete.
Announced in Open Commission.
Dated: 13.08.2021.