Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/253/2011

Mrs. Neena Narang - Complainant(s)

Versus

Reliant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Rajesh Kataria

17 Jul 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 253 of 2011
1. Mrs. Neena NarangW/o Ranjit Singh Narang son of Shri Iqabal Singh Naraang resident of # 795, Phase-4, Mohali.2. Ranjeet Singh Narang son of Shri Iqbal singh Narang, Both Residento of # 795Phase-4, Mohali. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Reliant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.,Registered office at Village Daun, Chandigarh-Kharar Road, District Mohali Punjab, through itd Managing Director/Diretor.2. Reliant Infrastructure Pvt. Lktd., Marketing Officeat SCO No.60-62, Sector-17-C Chandigarh. through its Manager. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 17 Jul 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.253 of 2011

 

 

Neena Narang & anr.       Vs.     Reliant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & anr.                              

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Rajesh Kataria, Counsel for Complainants.

Sh.Shireesh Gupta, Counsel for OPs.

 

Dated the 17th day of July, 2012

 

ORDER

 

 

            Sh.Rajesh Kataria-counsel for complainants has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect (jurisdiction), I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainants reserve their right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent authority/court’

 

            In view of the statement made by counsel for complainants, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent authority/court, as per law. The complainant No.2 is also present.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

            Sd/-                                                                             Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)                                         (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                                          PRESIDING MEMBER


MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, PRESIDING MEMBER ,