Date of Filing: 17/12/2011

        Date of Order: 31/12/2011

BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE -  20

Dated:  31^st DAY OF DECEMBER 2011

PRESENT

SRI.H.V.RAMACHANDRA RAO,B.Sc.,B.L., PRESIDENT

SRI.KESHAV RAO PATIL, B.COM., M.A., LL.B., PGDPR, MEMBER

C.C. NO.2300 OF 2011

Mr. Fahad Ahmed Khan,

S/o. Sri. A.A. Khan,

Aged About 31 years,

R/at: Lakshmaya Building,

C/o. Yashodamma, 1^st Floor,

Nelluru Halli, Adjacent, White Field,

BANGALORE-560 066.

(Rep. by In person)                                                            ….  Complainant.

V/s

Reliance World/OTC Address,

Reliance World - ITPL,

Aacendas Property Mgt. Service India Pvt. Ltd.,

3A Tower Block, Ground Floor,

ITPL, Whitefield Road, Bangalore.

Regd. Office:-

M/s. Reliance World,

Reliance WEbstore Ltd.,

H-Block, Ist Floor, Dhirubhai Ambani

Knowledge City, Thane-Belapur Road,

Koperkhairne, Navi Mumbai-400 710.                                 …. Opposite Party.

BY SRI. H.V.RAMACHANDRA RAO, PRESIDENT

-: ORDER:-

The brief antecedents that led to the filing of the complainant U/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act seeking direction to the Opposite Party to pay Rs.99,000/-, are necessary:-

          The complainant had obtained the net and broad band connection from the opposite party by paying Rs.1,599/- on a monthly rental of Rs.900 + taxes on 11.07.2011.  Thereafter the complainant came to know and discovered that the speed of the date card was extremely slow of about 100 Kbs.  In spite of intimating to the opposite party and seeking rectification nothing else will happened.  Hence the complaint.

2.       In this case the case was posted to hear on 26.12.2011, 29.12.2011, 30.12.2011 and to today on payment of costs even none of these days the complainant is present.  Hence perused the records.

3.       The points that arise for our consideration are:-

:- POINTS:-

1. Whether there is prima facie case to issue process to the opposite parties?
2. What Order?

4.       Our findings are:-

Point (A) :     In the Negative.

Point (B) :     As per the final Order

                    for the following:- 

-:REASONS:-

Point A & B:-

5.       The complaint is filed against the Reliance World.  Whether the reliance World is a proprietory concern, partnership firm private limited company who is representing it, is not stated.  If any firm or company is added as a party the authorized personnel had to represent them and such post should have been stated as representing the complaint.  Though several opportunities were given to the complainant to seek amendment of the complaint even on adjourning on payment of costs on none of the dates the complaint was present.  Hence there is no prima facie case to issue process to the opposite party.  Hence we hold the above points accordingly and proceed to pass the following:-

ORDER

1.       The complaint is dismissed as non maintainable.

2.       Return the extra sets filed by the parties to the concerned as under Regulation 20(3) of the Consumer’s Protection Regulation 2005.

(Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and then pronounced by us in the Open Forum on this the 31^st Day of December 2011)

MEMBER                                                         PRESIDENT