Assam

Cachar

CC/21/2020

Smti. Deepu Roy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Reliance Retail Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

07 May 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/2020
( Date of Filing : 01 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Smti. Deepu Roy
Old SBI Road, Arunachal
Cachar
Assam
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Reliance Retail Ltd.
Bijay Cresent, G.S Road, Rukminigaon, Sixmile Kamrup, Assam, Pin- 781006
Cachar
Assam
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Samarjit Dey PRESIDENT
  Kamal Kumar Sarda MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Adv. Sarmistha Paul (Bhartia), Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 07 May 2022
Final Order / Judgement

The case of the complainant , in  brief, is that  she had purchased  a  “Reconnect  1.5  ton  AC”   from  Reliance Retail Limited at Silchar ( hereinafter referred to as  Opposite Party  in short  O.P. )  on 21/07/2018  at  Rs.31,990/- which has inbuilt 2 years  warantee.  She  had also paid additional amount of Rs.2899/-  to  get  extended  warantee of another one year.  So all together she was enjoying  2+1 = 3 years  warantee from the date of delivery.  The  said AC was delivered   on  22/07/2018. Later on  as the complainant  found that the AC was not working properly so  she made a complaint  on 10/07/2020 but did not get any response from the  O.P.’s customer service team.  Then on 14/07/2020 she went to their store at Silchar and one Engineer came to her house and check the faulty AC and  told her that the PCB of the outdoor unit of the AC was damaged by  lizard which does not cover under warranty.  Thereafter on 20/07/2020 the O.P.  informed her that the cost of a new  PCB is Rs.7346/- and  they offered her   discount of 15% on the cost of PCB and asked her to pay an amount of Rs.6387/- .  It has been stated by the complainant that  on 05/08/2020  through mail she confirmed the  O.P. regarding her consent  to their offer  of 15%  discount and requested them to complete the repairing work as early as possible.  But on 23/08/2020  from the O.P. side it was informed  that due to non-availability of PCB  the AC is not repairable. Then the O.P.  offered her a commercial solution where  she shall get  refund of 40% of the purchase price  i.e., Rs.19,194/- but the amount  Rs.6387/-  being the cost of PCB would be deducted and the refund would be Rs.12,807/-  only.  According to the complainant,  she rejected that offer.  Her version is that  as the problem in the alleged AC  was  within the warranty period  so the O.P. is bound to repair the same.  The action of the O.P. amounts to  deficiency in services and unfair trade practice. The  complainant has therefore prayed for passing direction to the O.P.  to  repair the AC   or refund the entire amount paid to them. In addition  compensation of Rs.50,000/- for deficiency, mental pain,agony and harassment and  an amount of Rs.10,000/- for the cost of litigation.

                                                The O.P.  contested the case by filing written statement stating, interalia, that  there is  no reason or cause of action for filing this case, that the complaint is not maintainable in its present form and manner,  that the complaint does not disclose any consumer  dispute etc.  In  the written statement the O.P. has admitted the fact that the complainant  purchased  AIR CONDITIONER on 21/07/2018  from their store housed at  Imperial Mall, Silchar at the value of Rs.31,990/- .  In addition  she also paid  an amount of Rs.2899/- for extended warranty of one year. On  22/07/2018 the AC was delivered.  Subsequently  the AC started malfunctioning on 10/07/2020 and  after getting information from the complainant one Engineer of the O.P.  visited her house on 14/07/2020 and during inspection it was found that  the  PCB of the  said AC was malfunctioning  not because of any technical  or manufacturing defect which is covered by the warranty, rather said  PCB was completely damaged by  lizard which is not covered by warranty. Hench the complainant was asked to pay the cost of PCB which amounts to  Rs.7346/-.  Further version of the O.P. is that though they tried their best to replace the damaged  PCB with a new one but because of the covid-19 Pandemic the supply of the said  PCB was  stopped by the concerned company  and  hence due to this the PCB could not be repaired.  Thereafter as per company’s  norms  the complainant was offered compensation value which is equivalent to 60% of the purchase price of the said  AC  amounting  to Rs.19,194/- minus  the price of damaged PCB amounting Rs.6387/- i.e., an amount of Rs.12,807/-.  But the complainant  rejected the offer and refused to accept the said compensation value.  It is stated that the complainant purchased the product knowing all the terms and conditions but instead of that with malafide intention  filed this case only to harass and defame the  O.P.  Under the circumstances  it is prayed for dismissal of the case with cost infavour of the answering  O.P.  

                                                    In  support of the case,  the  complainant  submitted  her evidence  on  affidavit  as  PW-1  alongwith some exhibited documents.  On the other hand,   from the side of   O.P.   Reliance Retail  Ltd.  evidence  on  affidavit of  Mr. Murad Hussain  Barlaskar,  Store Manager   was  submitted as DW-1.  After closing of the evidence  both  sides  submitted written argument.   Perused the entire evidence on record.   Let us  appreciate the evidence  below. 

                                                        From the evidence of both PW-1  and  DW-1 it  reveals that the admitted position of  facts  in this case  is-  on  21/07/2018  the complainant  purchased  the alleged  AIR CONDITIONER   from the store  of the O.P. Reliance Retail Pvt. Ltd. housed at  Imperial Mall, Silchar at the value of Rs.31,990/-  having two years warantee .  In addition  the  complainant also paid  an amount of Rs.2899/- for extended warranty of another one year.  Thus the complainant paid total amount of Rs.31,990/- + Rs.2899/- =  Rs.34,889/- .  On  22/07/2018  the  said  AC was delivered.  Subsequently  the AC started malfunctioning on and from 10/07/2020 and  after getting information from the complainant one Engineer of the O.P.  visited her house on 14/07/2020 and during inspection it was found that  the  PCB of the  said AC was  damaged .  According to the O.P. , it was detected that the said PCB was damaged  not because of any technical  or manufacturing defect which is covered by the warranty, rather said  PCB was completely damaged by  lizard which is not covered by warranty.  DW-1 has submitted the picture of  damaged PCB  vide Annexure- A  .The said picture  clearly shows that lizard entered inside the PCB.  However the claim of the O.P. that  the said PCB was damaged  not because of any technical  or manufacturing defect , rather it  was  damaged by  lizard  which is not covered by warranty is not under challenge.  The evidence of the parties further go to show that the complainant was asked to pay the cost of PCB which amounts to  Rs.7346/-  and later on after deducting  15% discount  she was told to pay Rs.6387/- only to which  the complainant agreed.  That the  alleged AIR CONDITIONER  had  total three years  warranty  this fact is also not disputed.  It  reveals from the  record that  the  alleged item was purchased on  21/07/2018 and  problem  started on 10/07/2020 .  So there  can not be any dispute that the said problem in the PCB of the AIR CONDITIONER  started  within the period of warranty.  At the same time it is also not disputed that damage of PCB  by lizard does not come  within the terms and conditions of  warranty.  The  DW-1 also  has not  disputed the claim of the complainant  that  he agreed to pay the cost of the PCB.

                                           It  transpires  from  the evidence of DW-1 that                      they tried their best to replace the damaged  PCB with a new one but because of the covid-19 Pandemic the supply of the said  PCB was  stopped by the concerned company  and  hence due to this the PCB could not be repaired.  Thereafter as per company’s  norms  the complainant was offered compensation value which is equivalent to 60% of the purchase price of the said  AC  amounting  to Rs.19,194/- minus  the price of damaged PCB amounting Rs.6387/- i.e., an amount of Rs.12,807/- but the complainant  rejected the offer and refused to accept the said compensation value. 

                                                 It is not fault of the complainant that  new PCB could not be collected by the O.P.  As the problem arose within  the period of warranty so it is the duty of the O.P.  to repair the same .  It is  not the concern of the complainant wherefrom the O.P. will collect a new PCB.   On the other hand,  the O.P. is offering only 60%  of the purchase value  as compensation to the complainant after two years of its purchase .  Again from that 60% they want to deduct  the cost of the PCB   amounting to Rs.6387/- which does not appear to be justified.  It is a fact that the PCB was not damaged  for any mechanical or technical fault. Also  it  is  a  fact that  during  the  covid  period  many companies  closed their production  unit . 

                                               Under the above circumstances, we are of the considered  opinion that it would be justified  if  the complainant is paid  entire 60% of the net purchase value i.e.,  Rs.19194/- without any deduction  towards cost  of PCB.  The Complainant is also entitled to get back  Rs.2899/- which he paid  for extended warranty.  So  it is ordered that the O.P.  shall pay  total amount Rs.19194/- + Rs.2899/-  i.e.,  Rs.22,093/- ( Rupees twenty two thousand ninety three) only   to the complainant  within a period of 60(sixty) days from the date of this order else an interest @9% per annum would accrue on the entire amount from the date of this order till payment.  No order as to cost.

                                                   Judgment and order delivered on this 7th day of May’ 2022 with seal and signature. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Samarjit Dey]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Kamal Kumar Sarda]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.