BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
FA.NO.181 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDERS IN CC.NO.321/2018,
DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY
Between:
Jitendra Jain, S/o.Late ShMangal Chand Jain,
Aged about 54 years,
Past resident of: E7/1, Research Centre Imarat,
RCI Road, P.O.Vignyana Kancha, and Rangareddy
District 500069,
Residence wef 18 Jan 2021 is
Flat No.H28, 1302, Flat No.H28, 1302,
AWHO, Sandeep Vihar– Hoskote Rd,
Kannamangala, Whitefield Bengaluru,
Karnataka 560115.
.……Appellant/Complainant
And
1. Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd.,
4th Floor, Lake Shore Towers,
Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda,
Beside Yes Bank, Hyderabad – 500082
Email: jyoti.jain@ril.com
………Represented by its Manager.
2. Bharti Airtel Limited
(A Bharti Enterprise) Bharti Crescent,
1 Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj,
Phase II, New Delhi – 110 070.
compliance.officer@bharti.in
………..Represented by its Manager.
3. CHAIRMAN, Telecom Regulatory Authority
Of India, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan
(next to Zakir Hussain College) Jawaharlal
Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road)
New Delhi: 110 002
Email ID: ap@trai.gov.in ………Represented
by its Manager.
…..Respondents/Opposite Parties
Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant : Sri Jitendra Jain (PIP)
Counsel for the Respondents/Opp.Parties : M/s.M.Hari Babu-R1
M/s.Gopi Rajesh &
Associates –R2
Sri Sudhakar Rao
Kulkarni-R3
QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE
*******
Order :
1. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant/Complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order in CC.No.321/2018 dated 08.02.2021 passed by the District Commission, Ranga Reddy.
2. In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021. Thereafter, this Commission has suo motu issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities. In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present. Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeals are liable to be dismissed has having been abated.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.