Delhi

StateCommission

FA/1153/2013

RAJU KR. SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

RELIANCE GIC LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

03 Sep 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. FA/1153/2013
(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/04/2013 in Case No. 700/2010 of District New Delhi)
 
1. RAJU KR. SINGH
R/O, C/O CHANDGI RAM VILLAGE & POST CHAKKARPUR GURGAON, HARIYANA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. RELIANCE GIC LTD.
14-H, HANSALA BUILDING 14TH FLOOR, 15, BARAKHAMBHA ROAD NEW DELHI-110001
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

           Date of decision: 03.09.2014

First Appeal- 1153/2013

Sh. Raju Kumar Singh

S/o Sh. Sujit Kumar Singh

R/o, C/o Chandgi Ram

Village & Post Chakkarpur

Gurgaon, Haryana                                                                 …Appellant

 

VERSUS

Reliance General Insurance

14-H, Hansala Building

14th Floor, 15, Barakhamaba Road

New Delhi-110001.                                                        …….Respondent

 

CORAM

Justice Veena Birbal, President

Salma Noor, Member

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

1. Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

Salma Noor, Member

 

 

1)           In a complaint case bearing no. 700/2010, Raju Singh Vs Reliance Gen. Insurance, filed before District Forum M-Block, 1st Floor, Vikas Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi the Complainant absented himself on 04.04.2013, the date fixed for hearing, and the Forum dismissed the complaint in complainant’s default.

2)           That is what brings the Complainant/ Appellant in appeal before this Commission.

3)       We have heard, counsel for the appellant in this appeal at the admission stage.

4)          The version of the Complainant appellant for his non appearance on 04.04.2013 before the Forum is that the counsel for the appellant inadvertently jolted down the wrong date as 09.09.2013 in place of 04.04.2013 and thus the default occurs. To support his version complaint filed his own affidavit. There is no plausible reason not to rely and not to Act upon this version of the appellant. It has never been the policy of the law to stifle to contest and wherever possible, under the circumstances a lenient view in this regard has been recommended, so that the parities may have an opportunity to contest their case, and the matter may be decided on merits. We therefore, allow the appeal setting aside the dismissal orders dt. 04.04.2013 in question, and remand the case back to District Forum M-Block, 1st Floor, Vikas Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi with the direction to restore the complaint on its original number, and to proceed further in the case with accordance to law. The Appellant Complainant is directed to appear before the District Forum M-Block, 1st Floor, Vikas Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi on 14.10.2014.    

5)              A copy of this order be sent to District Forum M-Block, 1st Floor, Vikas Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi to keep it on complaint file and for compliance. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.