Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/356/2012

Pardeep Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

Reliance General Insurnace Co.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

complainat in person

26 Jul 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 356 of 2012
1. Pardeep SharmaS/o Sh. Suresh Kumar Sharma r/o H.No. 508AB/2, Ward No. 8, Lane No. 3, Shiv Colony, Bitna Road Pinjore-134102 (Distt-Panchkula) Haryana ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Reliance General Insurnace Co.Ltd.570, Naigaum Cross Road, Next to Royal Industrial Estate, Wadala (W) Mumbai-400031. Policy Servicing Branch Offic: Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. SCO 147-148, Sector 9C, Chandigarh2. IRDA (Consumer Affairs Deptt.)Basheer Bagh, 3rd Floor, Parisrama Bhavan, Hyerabad 500004 (AP)3. Insurance OmbusdmanSCO 101-103, 2nd Floor, Chandigarh -Sector 17-D, Batra Building ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :complainat in person, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 26 Jul 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No. 356 of 2012

 

 

Pardeep Sharma     Vs.     Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & ors.

 

PRESENT:

 

Complainant in person.

 

Dated the 26th day of July, 2012

 

ORDER

 

           

            The complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, I reserve my right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the defect”

 

            In view of the statement made by the complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the defect, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

            Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                          Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER

 


, HONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT ,