Andhra Pradesh

Visakhapatnam-II

CC/76/2014

Battina Siva Koteswara Rao - Complainant(s)

Versus

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Habeeb Sultan Ali

09 Jun 2015

ORDER

                                                             Registration of the Complaint:07-03-2014   

   Date of Order:09-06-2015

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II

AT VISAKHAPATNAM

                  

Present:

 

1.Sri H.ANANDHA RAO, M.A., L.L.B.,

       President

2.Sri C.V.RAO, M.A., B.L.,

                                             Male Member

3.Smt.K.SAROJA, M.A., B.L.,

       Lady Member

                                            

 

TUESDAY, THE 09TH OF JUNE, 2015

C.C.No.76/2014

 

 

BETWEEN:

Battina Siva Koteswara Rao, S/o late Narasimhulu,

Hindu, aged 40 years, r/at D.No.2-34,

China Yethapalem,  Sabbavaram Mandal,

Visakhapatnam District.                                                                           …Complainant

AND:

1.The Regional Manager,

Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd.,

# 4-1-327 to 333, IV FLOOR,

Sagar Plaza, Abids Road, Hyderabad-500001.

 

2.The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd.,

403, Eswar Paradise, Dwarakanagar Main Road,

Visakhapatnam-16.                                                                             …Opposite Parties

 

This case coming on 09-06-2015 for filing Affidavit of OP before us in the presence of Sri H.S.ALI, Advocate for the Complainant, and of Sri.D.SIVA PRASAD, Advocate for the 2nd OP, having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following.

 

 

DOCKET ORDER

(As per the Orders of the Hon’ble President on behalf of the Bench)

 

The Complainant filed not press memo after issuing notice to OP, stating that the claim is settled for an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs  only) and filed cheque for Rs.10,00,000/- bearing No.421757 dated 27-05-2015 drawn on HDFC Bank, Visakhapatnam in favour of the Complainant. Heard both sides. Memo is recorded. Hence, C.C. is dismissed as not pressed without costs. Memo filed by the complainant to take back the cheque  permitted.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 09th day of June, 2015.

Sd/-                                                       Sd/-                                        Sd/-

L.MEMBER                                          M.MEMBER                               PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.