Maharashtra

Central Mumbai

CC/13/67

Manda Tanaji Avad - Complainant(s)

Versus

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Abhaykumar N.Jadhav

24 Jun 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI
Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi Hospital
Parel, Mumbai-400 012
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/67
 
1. Manda Tanaji Avad
Kandar, Tal. Karmala
Solapur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd.
3rd Floor,Palai Plaza,Opp. Pritam Hotel,Dadar T.T.,
Mumbai-400 014
2. Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd
19, Reliance Centre, Walchand Hirachand Marg,Ballard Estate,
Mumbai-400 038
3. Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd.
507, Naigum Cross Road,Next to Royal Industrial Estate,Wadala(W)
Mumbai-400 031
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. B.S.WASEKAR PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. H.K.BHAISE MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Mr.Ganesh Shikhre, Adv. H/F Mr.Abhaykumar Jadhav, Adv.
 
For the Opp. Party:
Smt.Varsha Chavan, Adv.
 
ORDER

Per Mr.B.S.Wasekar, Hon’ble President

The complainant has filed this complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  According to the complainant, her husband died accidentally on 18th September, 2006.  According to the complainant, claim was submitted to the government authority but no date is mentioned for submitting the claim.  As there is delay, the complainant has filed application for condonation of delay.  It is opposed by the opponent. We have heard Mr.Ganesh Shikhre, Adv. for the Complainant and Smt.Varsha Chavan, Adv. for the Opponent on the application for condonation of delay.  According to the opponent, no claim was submitted and no explanation is given for delay condonation.  The complainant is unable to satisfy when the claim was submitted.  She has also not produced any evidence to show that the claim was submitted to the opponent or any authority. Delay is not properly explained. There is no reason to condone the delay. Hence, the application filed by the complainant for condonation of delay is hereby rejected. Consequently, the complaint stands dismissed. Parties are left to bear their own costs. Inform the parties accordingly.

 

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. B.S.WASEKAR]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. H.K.BHAISE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.