Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/633/2013

Sudesh Awasthy W/o Ashok Kumar Awasthi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Reliance Communications Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

18 Dec 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/633/2013
 
1. Sudesh Awasthy W/o Ashok Kumar Awasthi
house No. 3045/1, Sector 41 D, chandigarh.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Reliance Communications Ltd.
S.C.O. 135-136, Sector 9-C, chandigarh -160 009 through its manager
2. M/s Mobile Media,
SCO No.378, Sector 37, chandigarh through its manager.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P. L. AHUJA PRESIDENT
  MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL MEMBER
  MRS. SURJEET KAUR MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I,

U.T.CHANDIGARH

========

 

                                               

Consumer Complaint No

:

633 of 2013

Date of Institution

:

24.10.2013

Date of Decision   

:

18.12.2013

 

Sudesh Awasthy w/o Ashok Kumar Awasthi, House No.3045/1, Sector 41-D,Chandigarh.

…..Complainant

                                               

1.            Reliance Communications Ltd., SCO No.135-136, Sector 9-C,Chandigarh

 

2.          M/s Mobile Media, SCO No.378, Sector 37,Chandigarh, through its Manager.

                                                           

……Opposite Parties

 

 

QUORUM:                                                                                                           

ARGUED BY:Sh.H.P.S.Kochhar, Counsel for complainant.

 

PER P.L.AHUJA, PRESIDENT

1.                       

2.                       

3.                       

4.                        

“Fora below have dismissed the complaint filed by the petitioner relying upon the judgment of Supreme Court in General Manager Telecom Vs. M.Krishnan & Another – (2009) 8 SCC 481 wherein it has been held that any dispute between the subscriber and the telegraph authority can be resolved by taking recourse to arbitration proceedings only.

 

The judgment of the Supreme Court is binding on all the subordinate courts. There is no scope for interference. Dismissed.”

 

It is also worth nothing that then Prakash Verma filed a Special Leave Petition to Appeal No.24577 of 2010 in the Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Supreme Court vide an order dated 1.10.2010 dismissed that Special Leave Petition. In this view of the matter, any dispute between the subscriber and the telegraph authority can be resolved by taking recourse to arbitration proceedings only.

5.                       

6.                       

7.                       

8.                       

                                                              

 

 

 

               

[ Surjeet Kaur]

[Rajinder Singh Gill]

(P. L. Ahuja)

 

Member

Member

President

rb

 

 

 


 

 







DISTRICT FORUM – I

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 633   

 

PRESENT: None.

O R D E R

                       

 

 

 

 

18.12.2013

[ Surjeet Kaur]

[Rajinder Singh Gill]

(P. L. Ahuja)

 

Member

Member

President

rb

 

 

 

       

 


 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P. L. AHUJA]
PRESIDENT
 
[ MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL]
MEMBER
 
[ MRS. SURJEET KAUR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.