Punjab

Amritsar

CC/16/178

Amit - Complainant(s)

Versus

Reliance Co. - Opp.Party(s)

21 Jun 2016

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
SCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit Avenue
Amritsar
Punjab
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/178
 
1. Amit
F-24/318, St. no.2, New Jawahar Nagar, Batala Road, Amritsar
Amritsar
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Reliance Co.
1st floor, Tower F.DLF Building, Plot no.2, Rajiv Gandhi Technology Park, Chandigarh
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Sh. S.S.Panesar PRESIDENT
  Kulwant Kaur MEMBER
  Anoop Lal Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMRITSAR.

 

Consumer Complaint No. 178 of 2016

Date of Institution: 22.4.2016

  Date of Decision: 21.6.2016

 

Mr.Amit age 29 years son of Sita Ram R/o H.No. F-24/318, Street No. 2, New Jawahar Nagar, Batala Road, Amritsar Mobile No.98880-42410

Complainant

Versus

  1. Reliance Company dealing with Internet Services, having its office at Chandigarh (Reliance Communication Ltd., Ist Floor, Tower F.DLF Building, Plot No. 2, Rajiv Gandhi Technology Park, Chandigarh-160101) through its Director/Managing Director/Authorized Signatory/Any other Principal Officer thereof.
  2. Perfect Services, Shop No. 3, SSSS Complex, Batala Road, Amritsar through its Proprietor/Partner/Authorized Signatory/Any other Principal Officer thereof

Opposite Parties

 

Complaint under section 12 & 13  of Consumer Protection Act, 1986

 

Present:    For the Complainant                            : In person  

For the Opposite Parties            : Ex-parte

 

Coram

 

Sh.S.S.Panesar, President

Ms.Kulwant Kaur Bajwa, Member

Sh.Anoop Sharma,Member

 

Order dictated by:

Sh.S.S. Panesar, President.

 

1.       Mr.Amit complainant has brought the instant complaint under section  12 &13 of  the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on the allegations that complainant is permanent resident of H.No.F-24/318, Street No.2, New Jawahar Nagar, Batala Road, Amritsar and is peace loving and law abiding citizen of India. The complainant purchased Advance Rental Unlimited Plan for 12 months having 3G Data Plan from opposite party No.2 vide bill No. 287 dated 17.2.2016  and paid a sum of Rs. 10,500/-. Copy of the bill/invoice is annexed herewith. Thus , the complainant is a consumer of the opposite party under the relevant definition of Consumer Protection Act. At the time of purchasing the said data plan, it was assured that unlimited quota  for 12 months having 3G Data Plan shall be provided by the opposite parties to the complainant . Believing the assurance  of the opposite parties, the complainant purchased the said Data Plan. However, opposite parties on its own without any plausible reason and  cause, just after two months of the purchase of the said data plan, told the complainant that  the data of the said plan has been over/finished, so they were unable to provide internet facility to the complainant. On the other hand complainant had purchased unlimited data plan as per the receipts got by the complainant, copy of which is attached. The complainant has time and again approached the opposite parties with the request to provide unlimited data facility for 12 months for which the complainant has paid the demanded amount. But complainant was put off every time and thus he has to run from pillar to post for getting his grievances redressed, but of no avail. Due to the said acts and omissions of the opposite parties, the complainant has suffered huge mental tension, agony, harassment and inconvenience  at the hands of the opposite parties. The complainant is legally entitled to compensation of Rs. 50000/- besides the insurance claim and there is no bar to the claim of the complainant  in this regard. The complainant has sought the following reliefs vide instant complaint:-

(i)      To direct the opposite parties to restore data plan or to refund the amount covered under the bill of said mobile.

(ii)     The opposite parties may be directed to pay Rs. 50000/- towards compensation for causing mental harassment, agony etc to the complainant.

(iii)    To direct the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs. 15000/- towards litigation expenses.

Hence, this complaint.

2.       Upon notice despite due service none put in appearance on behalf of the opposite parties. As such opposite parties were ordered to be proceeded against ex-parte.

3.       In ex-parte evidence complainant tendered into evidence his duly sworn affidavit Ex.C-1, copy of bill dated 17.2.2016 Ex.C-2, copy of service details Ex.C-3, one CD Ex.C-4 and closed his evidence.

4.       We have heard the complainant in person and have carefully gone through the record on the file.

5.       From the perusal of the record produced by the complainant as well as his duly sworn affidavit, it becomes evidence that the complainant purchased Advance Rental Unlimited Plan for 12 months having 3G Data Plan from opposite party No.2 vide bill No. 287 dated 17.2.2016 on payment of Rs. 10,500/-. Copy of the bill/invoice accounts for Ex.C-2. There is evidence on record that at the time of purchasing of the data, opposite party No.1 assured the complainant that unlimited quota for 12 months having 3G Data Plan shall be provided to the complainant  and believing the assurance of the opposite parties, complainant had purchased the said data plan. However, opposite parties on their own without any plausible reason and cause, just after two months of the purchase of the data plan, intimated the complainant that the data of the said plan has been over/finished and they were unable to provide internet facility to the complainant. Copy of the data plan accounts for Ex.C-3. The evidence adduced by the complainant in support of his case has gone unrebutted on record as the opposite parties suffered ex-parte despite due service voluntarily. It means and imply that opposite parties have admitted the case of the complainant impliedly and they have no defence to offer.

6.       From the appraisal of the evidence on record, it becomes evident that opposite parties are deficient in service. Since they have stopped the internet service after the expiry of 2 months of the issue of data plan Ex.C-3, which amounts unfair trade practice. In such a situation, the complainant is entitled for refund of Rs. 10,500/- paid by him as advance fee alongwith interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of passing of the order until full and final recovery. Compliance of this order be made within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order ; failing which, complainant shall be at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this Forum to get the order executed in accordance with law. Copies of the orders be furnished to the parties free of costs. File is ordered to be consigned to the record room.

 

Announced in Open Forum

Dated : 21.6.2016

/R/                                                                         ( S.S.Panesar )

President

 

                              ( Kulwant Kaur Bajwa)           (Anoop Sharma)

                                                Member                         Member

 

 

 

 
 
[ Sh. S.S.Panesar]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Kulwant Kaur]
MEMBER
 
[ Anoop Lal Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.