NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4610/2009

M/S. LOKHANDWALA DEVELOPERS - Complainant(s)

Versus

REKHA KISAN PATIL & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. WALESHA & CO.

08 Jan 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4610 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 24/09/2009 in Appeal No. 403/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. M/S. LOKHANDWALA DEVELOPERS32, Kika Street, GulalwadiMumbai ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. REKHA KISAN PATIL & ORS.B/101, Janki Safal Complex, Sector No. 19A, Nerul (East)Navi Mumbai - 4007062. M/S PRIENCE REALTORS PVT. LTD.174, Mada BUilding, Abdul Rehman StreetMumbai - 4000033. SH. RAJESH M. MEHTA8/6, Vaikunth Vrundavan Society, N.S. Mankar Marg, Sion, ChunabhattiMumbai - 4000324. SH. IDRISHBHAI MOHAMMED BHAI COMPANYWALADadachandraji Building, 2nd Floor, Room No. 9, Opp. Mazgaon CourtMumbai - 400010 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,PRESIDING MEMBER
For the Petitioner :M/S. WALESHA & CO.
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 08 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Heard counsel for the Petitioner who have stated before me that possession of the flat, in question, has already been handed over to the Complainant. The matter had proceeded ex parte as against the present Petitioner before the Consumer Forum. Even though vakalatnama had been filed on behalf of the present Petitioner before the Consumer Forum but the matter was not contested. The present Petitioner then filed appeal before the State Commission which was dismissed on the ground of delay in filing the appeal. In this view of the matter and also on account of the fact that the possession has already been handed over by the Petitioner to the Complainant. I am not inclined to entertain this revision. The revision is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.


......................JR.K. BATTAPRESIDING MEMBER