Maharashtra

Thane

CC/11/207

Mr.Nandaanvan Sreenivasa Rao - Complainant(s)

Versus

Registrar of Companies, M.C.A.Govt.of India, Rep.by Henry Richard - Opp.Party(s)

27 Jun 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/11/207
 
1. Mr.Nandaanvan Sreenivasa Rao
Door No.8-2-13, Kottapeta, Lawyer Peta Po, Ongole-2, Prakasam, Dt-A.P.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Registrar of Companies, M.C.A.Govt.of India, Rep.by Henry Richard
100, Everest Building, Marine, ?Drive, Mumbai-400 002,
2. Shan Interwell (India) Ltd., Rep.byShivkumar D.Iyer
Plot No.42, Achhad Industrial Estate, Achhad Dist, Thane.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. R.B. SOMANI PRESIDENT
  HON'BLE MRS. JYOTI IYER MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

Order below Exhibit 1.

27th June 2012 

 

1.                  The applicant/Complainant has filed the present complaint against the Opponent claiming different relief including refund of deposit, cost etc. During the pendancy of the complaint, the Complainant has applied before this Forum for adjournment of the complaint by the registered letter received by the Office of the Forum on 12/03/2012 and again this Forum has received the telegram dated 16/04/2012 stating that the Complainant wants to withdraw the complaint before this Forum. In view of the said telegram as the same was not known to this Forum the Registrar of this Forum has issued the letter calling upon the Complainant to remain present before this Forum or file the application in person and verify the content  therein,  so also, Complainant was directed to file a withdrawal application duly affirmed and notarized  and further that in his absence the matter will be posted on the given  date  i.e 15/06/2012.  Meanwhile the office of this Forum was in receipt of the letter on 03/05/2012 duly notarized and signed alongwith covering letter dtd. 23/5/2012.  The matter was ordered to be taken on board on 05/06/2012. However it could not come on board, hence taken on board today holding that the Complainant do not want  to prosecute the case and in view of the notarized application the Complaint is dismissed for want of prosecution.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. R.B. SOMANI]
PRESIDENT
 
[ HON'BLE MRS. JYOTI IYER]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.