NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2578/2014

AGNIVESH GUPTA - Complainant(s)

Versus

REGIONAL HEAD (AP & CHENNAI) HDFC BANK & 5 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

26 Aug 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2578 OF 2014
 
(Against the Order dated 29/04/2014 in Appeal No. 1/2014 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)
1. AGNIVESH GUPTA
R/O FLAT NO-312 AAKRUTI ENCLAVE, KPHB COLONY, ROAD NO-4 OPP MAHARASHTRA BANK,
HYDERABAD - 500085
A.P
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. REGIONAL HEAD (AP & CHENNAI) HDFC BANK & 5 ORS.
SRI C.S GOPINATH, HDFC BANK LTD. 6-1-73 GR. & 3RD FLOOR, SAEED PLAZA. LAKDI KA PHOOL,
HYDERABAD - 500 004
A.P
2. THE CHAIRMAN/CHAIRPERSON, SHRI CM VASUDEV , HDFC BANK LTD.,
HDFC BANK HOUSE, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, LOWER PAREL (W)
MUMBAI - 400 013
MAHARASHTRA
3. HDFC BANK LTD,
BRANCH MANAGER, PLOT NO-10 & 15 DHARAMAREDDY COLONY, KUKATPALLY HOUSING BOARD,
HYDERABAD - 500 085
A.P
4. BRANCH MANAGER, MEDHTIPATNAM BRANCH.
MS. K,SAILAZA HDFC BANK LTD, SGM MALL , HDFC BANK COMPLEX, (BELOW SC RLY RESERVATION) MEHDIPATNAM BUS STOP,
HYDERABAD - 500 028
A.P
5. CLUSTER HEAD ,SRI KAUSHAL RAJ SINGH,
(KUKATPALLY EXT.COUNTER BRANCH) HDFC BANK LTD. 6-1-73, 3RD FLOOR, SAEED PLAZA, LAKDI KA POOL
HYDERABAD - 500 004
A.P
6. HEAD RETAIL PRODUCTS,
MR.RAHUL BHAGAT HDFC BANK LTD, TRADE WORLD, C WING, 1ST FLOOR, KAMALA MILSS COMPOUND, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, LOWER PAREL (W)
MUMBAI - 400 013
MAHARASHTRA
7. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO REGIONAL HEAD,HDFC BANK LTD
6-1-73 GR 6 3RD FLOOR, SAEED PLAZA, LAKDI KA POOL
HYDERABAD - 500 004
A.P
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. Agnivesh Gupta, Petitioner in person
For the Respondent :

Dated : 26 Aug 2014
ORDER

 

          This revision petition, by the complainant, petitioner herein, is directed against order dated 29.04.2014, whereby his transfer application has been allowed and the complaint has been directed to be transferred from District Forum-III, Hyderabad to District Forum-II, Hyderabad.  As a matter of fact, the counsel for the opposite parties, respondents herein, had stated before the State Commission that he had no objection to the transfer of the complaint.  In view of the said no objection, the State Commission has allowed the transfer application, without going into other aspects, raised in the complaint or in the transfer application.

          Having perused the transfer application, which has been placed at page-24 of the revision petition, we are unable to persuade ourselves to agree with the submission of the complainant, who has argued his case in person, that he does not expect justice even from the Forum where the complaint has now been transferred.  We are, therefore, not inclined to direct transfer of the complaint to Ranga Reddy District Forum.

We do not find any infirmity in the impugned order, warranting our interference.  The revision petition is dismissed accordingly.

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.