Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/68/2018

Zaheer Ahmed - Complainant(s)

Versus

Real Value Promoters P Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

R.Shankar

28 Jun 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                            MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.68/2018

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

Mr. Zaheer Ahmed,

S/o. Mr. Mohammed Naseerullah,

Represented by his Attorney,

Md. Naseerullah,

S/o. Md. Muneerudin,

1^st Street, Perambur High Road,

Jamalia,

Chennai – 600 012.                                                                                .. Complainant.                                                   

- Versus –

1. M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd.,

Represented by its Directors,

Mr. Vellore Subramaniyan Suresh,

Mr. Ramaswamy Damodaran,

Mrs. Jayasathya Suresh,

Mr. Batcha Subramanian,

Mr. Ramachandra Iyer Ravichandran,

Mrs. Priya Rajendran,

No.17/1, Poes Road, 1^st Street,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.  

 

2. Mr. Vellore Subramaniyan Suresh,

Director,

M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd.,

No.17/1, Poes Road, 1^st Street,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.  

 

3. Mr. Ramaswamy Damodaran,

Director,

M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd.,

No.17/1, Poes Road, 1^st Street,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.  

 

4. Mrs. Jayasathya Suresh,

Director,

M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd.,

No.17/1, Poes Road, 1^st Street,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.  

 

5. Mr. Batcha Subramanian,

Director,

M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd.,

No.17/1, Poes Road, 1^st Street,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.  

 

6. Mr. Ramachandra Iyer Ravichandran,

Director,

M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd.,

No.17/1, Poes Road, 1^st Street,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.  

 

7. Mrs. Priya Rajendran,

Director,

M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd.,

No.17/1, Poes Road, 1^st Street,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.                                                                          .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the Complainant                            : M/s. R. Shankar

Counsel for the Opposite parties 1 to 4, 6 & 7  : M/s. A. Palaniappan

5^th Opposite party                                             : Given up

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 28.06.2023 for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M., still, there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No costs.

 

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                       PRESIDENT