Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/12/102

Vijayakukmar.B. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ravindran @ Dhanu - Opp.Party(s)

Prakash Ammannaya PR , Kasaragod)

20 Jun 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/102
 
1. Vijayakukmar.B.
S/o. Muniyaru Baradka House, Badiadka Village, Po.Peradala
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Ravindran @ Dhanu
S/o. Babu, R/at Near Periadka Water Tank, Shiribhagilu.Po.
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE P.Ramadevi Member
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

                                                                            Date of filing   :   23-04-2012 

                                                                            Date of order   :   20 -06-2012

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                CC.102/2012

                         Dated this, the   20th     day of   June    2012

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                             : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                      : MEMBER

SMT. K.G.BEENA                                        : MEMBER

 

Vijaya Kumar.B, S/o. Muniyaru,                               } Complainant

R/at Baradka House, Badiadka village,

Peradala.Po. Kasaragod.Dt.

(Adv. Prakash Ammannaya.P.R, Kasaragod)

 

Ravindran @ Dhanu, S/o. Babu,                             } Opposite party

R/at Near Periadka Water Tank,

Shiribagilu.Post and  Village,

Kasaragod Taluk & Dist.

(Exparte)

 

                                                                        O R D E R

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ, PRESIDENT

            Case of the complainant in short is as follows:

            Complainant approached the opposite party for doing certain aluminum fabrication work to his newly constructed house and entrusted `5000/- as advance on 21-04-2011. But opposite party did not turn up to do the works as against his promise to do the work within 10 days.  Hence the complaint.

2.         Though notice is sent to opposite party by registered post, he declined to accept the notice and hence it is returned  unserved with the endorsement ‘refused’.  Therefore opposite party had to be set exparte.

3.         Complainant filed affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and Exts A1 to A3 marked.  Counsel for the complainant heard.

4.         In the affidavit also the complainant stated that the complainant did not turn up- to do the aluminum fabrication work though he received `5000/- as advance.

5.         There is no explanation forthcoming from the opposite party for not doing the aluminum fabrication work inspite of receipt of `5000/- as advance.

            The complaint is therefore allowed opposite party is directed to refund `5000/- to the complainant with interest @ 10% from the date of complaint till payment together with a cost of `2000/-.  Time for compliance of this order is limited to 2 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

 

MEMBER                                           MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT

Exts.

A1. 26-12-2011 copy of lawyer notice.

A2. Postal receipt

A3. Postal acknowledgement card.

 

 

MEMBER                                           MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT

Pj/

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE P.Ramadevi]
Member
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.