Haryana

StateCommission

MA/188/2017

IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ravinder Singh - Opp.Party(s)

19 Dec 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

     

                                                          Civil Misc. No.188 of 2017 in

                                                          First Appeal No.1250 of 2016

Date of Institution: 30.11.2017

Date of Decision:  19.12.2017

 

IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited, Registered Office, IFFCO Sadan, C-1, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi-17.               

                                      Applicant-Appellant (Opposite Party No.1)

Versus

1.      Ravinder Singh son of Shri Bhagwan, resident of Village and Post Office Badli, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, Haryana.

 

                             Respondent (Complainant)

 

2.      Manoj, agent of IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited, running his office under the name and style of Shree Khatu Shyam Insurance near Matindu Sampla Road, Kharkhoda.

                             Respondent (Opposite Party No.2)

 

 

CORAM:             Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                            Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.

                             Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

 

                                                                                                            

For the applicant:         Shri Yogesh Gupta, Advocate.

 

O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL)

 

First Appeal No.1250 of 2016 titled ‘IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited Versus Ravinder Singh and others’ was dismissed by this Commission vide order dated September 15^th, 2017. It was ordered that the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the complainant.

2.      By filing this application, IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited-applicant (for short ‘Insurance Company’) seeks refund of the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/-.

3.      Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the entire awarded amount has been paid to the complainant vide order dated May 23^rd, 2017 of District Forum, Sonepat (Annexure-1), whereby the complainant received the amount of Rs.8,99,673/- and also made a statement that nothing was due against the Insurance Company.

4.      In view of above, the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited be released to the applicant against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules. 

5.      Disposed of.

 

 

Announced 19.12.2017

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(Balbir Singh) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

  D.R.