Ravi Nursing Home & 2 others V/S C. Suresh - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CD/2000/116

C. Suresh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ravi Nursing Home & 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

23 May 2002

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009
consumer case(CC) No. CD/2000/116

C. Suresh						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Ravi Nursing Home & 2 others						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Both parties called out various times. They are not present. This complaint is filed against opposite parties 1 to 3 on the ground of medical negligence and deficiency in service. Steps were not taken against opposite party No.2 and complaint was dismissed as against opposite party No.2. This matter is pending nearly since 2 years. In the interest of justice notice was sent by RPAD to the given address of the complainant and the same is returned with endorsement that there was no such addressee. Advocate for the complainant is also not present. Under such circumstances, it is not just and proper to discuss the complaint on merits. Complainant has not filed any affidavit. Hence we proceed to pass following order. ORDER Complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Send the certified copies of this order to both parties under certificate of posting.

Both parties called out various times. They are not present. This complaint is filed against opposite parties 1 to 3 on the ground of medical negligence and deficiency in service. Steps were not taken against opposite party No.2 and complaint was dismissed as against opposite party No.2. This matter is pending nearly since 2 years. In the interest of justice notice was sent by RPAD to the given address of the complainant and the same is returned with endorsement that there was no such addressee. Advocate for the complainant is also not present. Under such circumstances, it is not just and proper to discuss the complaint on merits. Complainant has not filed any affidavit. Hence we proceed to pass following order.<br /> ORDER<br /> Complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution.<br /> No costs.<br /> Send the certified copies of this order to both parties under certificate of posting.