Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/19/337

Anitha Saji - Complainant(s)

Versus

Raveendran - Opp.Party(s)

28 Feb 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/337
( Date of Filing : 03 Oct 2019 )
 
1. Anitha Saji
sreehari,thalmukku,murukumpuzha,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Raveendran
JPRS Engineerings,mullainagar,coimbatone
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 28 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

PRESENT

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR

:

MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

C.C. No. 337/2019 Filed on 03/10/2019

ORDER DATED:  28/02/2023

 

Complainant

:

Anitha Saji, Sree Hari, Thalamukku, Murukkum Puzha.P.O., Thiruvananthapuram – 695 302.

(Party in person)

Opposite party

:

The Proprietor, J.P.R.S.Engineering, S.F.No.380, Mullai Nagar, Raveendranath Tagore Road, Maniyakarampalayam, Ganapathy, Coimbatore – 641 006.

 

ORDER

SRI. VIJU V.R : MEMBER

The complainant has presented this complaint before this Commission under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.

This is a complainant filed by the complainant against the opposite party in respect of a chappathi making unit.The opposite party has not a resolved the problems occurred in the chappathi making unit and the complainant alleges deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party.The complainant approached this Commission for redressing her grievances.The opposite party after receiving the notice from this Commission didn’t appeared before this Commission, hence they were set ex parte.

Even though so many opportunities were given to the complainant for filing affidavit in lieu of chief examination, the complainant has not filed the affidavit before this Commission.As she has not filed affidavit in lieu of chief examination, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed.

In the result the complaint is dismissed.There is no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 28th day of February,  2023.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN                                                                   

 

:

 

PRESIDENT

                 Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

  •  

 

MEMBER

 

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.