Haryana

Karnal

CC/213/2023

Gian Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Rasi Seeds Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Pawan Kumar Goyal

06 May 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.213 of 2023

                                                          Date of instt.06.04.2023

                                                          Date of Decision:06.05.2024

 

Gian Chand son of Sh. Ram Singh, Resident of House No.770, Sector-16, Urban Estate, Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Rasi Seeds Pvt., Ltd., Rasi Enclave, Green Fields, 737-C, Puliyakulam road, Coimbatore-641045 (Tamilnadu) through its Director.
2. M/s India Seed and Pesticides, Sabzi Mandi, Karnal, through its Proprietor Pawan Kumar.

                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Sh. Mohit Arora, Counsel for the OP-1.

                Sh. Vishal Goyal, Counsel for the OP-2.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the second last opportunity. No evidence is present. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. It is already 03:30 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 02.08.2023. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but has failed to conclude his evidence. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                   Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:06.05.2024.            

                      President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                   Member