Tamil Nadu

Vellore

CC/22/34

Rajesh A Rajkumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ranjithkumar - Opp.Party(s)

Tr.K.Karthikeyan

20 Oct 2022

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
Combined Court Buildings
Sathuvachari, Vellore -632 009
 
Complaint Case No. CC/22/34
( Date of Filing : 07 Jun 2022 )
 
1. Rajesh A Rajkumar
S/o.Panneerselvam No.198 Beemanpatti Village Melpatti Road, Gudiyattam Taluk Vellore
Vellore
Tamilnadu
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Ranjithkumar
Rownack Garments Station Road, Bakthiyarpur Patna Patna Dist 803212
Patna
Bihar
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Tr.A.Meenakshi Sundaram, B.A,B.L., PRESIDENT
  Tr.R.Asghar Khan, B.Sc, B.L., MEMBER
  Selvi.I.Marian Rajam Anugraha, MBA, MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

                                Date of filing: 07.06.2022

                                 Date of order: 20.10.2022

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, VELLORE        

PRESENT: THIRU. A. MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM, B.A., B.L.   PRESIDENT

                THIRU. R. ASGHAR KHAN, B.Sc., B.L.                  MEMBER – I

        SELVI. I. MARIAN RAJAM ANUGRAHA, M.B.A.,   MEMBER-  II

 

THURSDAYTHE20THDAY OF OCTOBER2022

CONSUMER COMPLAINANT NO. 34/2022

Rajesh @ Rajkumar,

S/o. Panneerselvam,

No.198, Beeman Patti Village,

MelpattiRoad,GudiyathamTaluk,

Vellore District.                                                                           ...Complainant 

-Vs-

Ranjithkumar,

Rownack  Garments,

Station Road,Pakthiyaarpure (Patna),

Patna District,

State Bihar-803 212.                                                                  ...Opposite party

 

Counsel for complainant            :   Thiru.K. Karthikeyan

Counsel for opposite  party         :   Set exparte on 08.07.2022            

ORDER

 

THIRU. A. MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM, B.A.,B.L. PRESIDENT

    This complaint has been filed Under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019.  The complainant has prayed this Hon’ble Commission to direct the opposite party to refund of Rs.25,000/- and to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation for deficiency in service and mental agony and also to pay cost.

1.The case of the complaint is briefly as follows:

    The complainant on seeing the advertisement in the YouTube Channel of the opposite party of purchasing the following items for  Rs.25,000/-.

 

The details of the items purchased are as below:

  1. T. Shirt 40x50 pic             Rs.2000/

  2. Shirt 35x50 pic             Rs.1750/

  3. Jacket 150x20 pic             Rs.3000/

  4. Mix Kits 10x50 pic               Rs.500/

  5. Royal 30x30 pic              Rs.900/

  6. KushiSalai 45x30 pic          Rs.1350/

  7. Lash Salai 75x10 pic            Rs.750/

  8. Shirts 99 x 10 pic                Rs.990/

  9. PoonamSalai 25 x 30 pic         Rs.750/

  10. Cotton Shirt 45 x 30 pic         Rs.1350/ 

  11. Ladies top 25x30    pic        Rs.750/

  12.  Fancy top kurthy 30 x20 pic    Rs.600/

  13. UllanSweater 65x20 pic         Rs.1300/

  14. Mix print  25 x 20 pic        Rs.500/

                                          ___________

                                              Rs.16,490/-

5% G.S.T                               Rs.     824/

Package Charges                Rs.      700/

  ______________

Total Amount               Rs.18,014

                     ______________

The allegation of the complainant is that after receipt of the sale consideration the opposite party has send a parcel through VRL parcel service on 04.12.2021.  When he opened the parcel he was shocked because the dress send by the opposite party are second handand of substandard quality for which the complainant also submitted the video recording. On seeing the aforesaid substandard goods the complainant issued legal notice on 04.03.2022 to recall the aforesaid goods and refund the Rs.25,000/- to the complainant but there was no response from the opposite party.  Hence, the opposite party has filed the present complaint  for refund of the aforesaid Rs.25,000/- with interest and for compensation.  

 

2.    On receipt of this notice from this Hon’ble Commission.  Opposite party did not appear, several opportunities were given.  Hence the opposite party called absent set exparte.

 

3.    Proof affidavit of complainant filed, Ex.A1 to Ex.A6 were marked.Written argument of complainant side not filed.  Oral argument of complainant heard.

 

4.The points that of arises for consideration are:

    1. Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite      

               party?

 

    2. Whether the complainant is entitled for relief as claimed in the complaint?

3. To what relief complainant is entitled to?

 

5. Point Nos.1 & 2:    

    The complainant on seeing the advertisement of the opposite party in the Youtube Channel, he purchased the following items list for Rs.25,000/- for which the complainant marked the invoices as Ex.A2 and Ex.A3.  The allegation of the complainant is that after receipt of the sale consideration the opposite party has sent the parcel through VRL parcel service on 04.12.2021.  When he opened the parcel, he was shockedbecause the dress send by the opposite party are second hand and substandard one for which the complainant also submitted the video recording.  On seeing the aforesaid substandard goods the complainant issued legal notice on 04.03.2022 to recall the aforesaid goods and refund of Rs.25,000/- to the complainant.   But there was no response from the opposite party. Hence, the opposite party has filed the present complaint for refund of the aforesaid Rs.25,000/-with interest and for compensation.  On receipt of this complaint, this commission issued the  notice to the opposite party.  Despite of receipt of this notice from this  Hon’ble commission, the opposite party did not appear before this Hon’ble Commission and lead any contra evidence to disprove the complainant allegation.  Therefore we have no other option except to accept the contention of the complainant.  Accordingly this complaint is allowed.  Hence, these Point Nos.1 and 2 are decided in favour of the complainant.

6. POINT NO.3:    As we have decided in Point Nos.1 and 2 that there is a deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. The opposite party is hereby directed to refund of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) the cost of the dresses and to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-  (Rupees Two Lakh only) as compensation for deficiency in service and mental agony and also to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) towards cost to the complainant.  Hence, this Point No.3 is also answered accordingly.

 

7.    In this result, this complaint is allowed. The opposite party is hereby directed to refund of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only ) the cost of the dresses and to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-  (Rupees Two Lakh only) as compensation for deficiency in service and mental agony and also to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) towards cost to the complainant, within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the above amounts shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of receipt of this order to till the date of realization.    

Dictated to the steno-typist transcribed and typed by her corrected and pronounced by us in the open Commission on this the 20th October 2022.

 

    Sd/-                     Sd/-                      Sd/-

MEMBER-I                                          MEMBER – II                                PRESIDENT

LIST OF COMPLAINANT SIDE DOCUMENTS:

Ex.A1-29.11.2021–  Copy of payment transaction receipt

Ex.A2.03.12.2021 – Copy of Khushbu Garments receipt

Ex.A3-19.12.2021 - Copy of Rounak Garments receipt

Ex.A4-04.03.2022 - Office Copy of legal notice 

Ex.A5-17.03.2022 -  Track Consignment receipt 

 

Ex.A6                   -   C.D

 

LIST OF OPPOSITE PARTY SIDE DOCUMENTS:   -NIL-


 

    Sd/-                     Sd/-                      Sd/-

MEMBER-I                                          MEMBER – II                                PRESIDENT

 
 
 
[ Tr.A.Meenakshi Sundaram, B.A,B.L.,]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Tr.R.Asghar Khan, B.Sc, B.L.,]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Selvi.I.Marian Rajam Anugraha, MBA,]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.