BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD

F.A.

Between:

Rangu Dakshina Murthy

S/o. Ramaswamy

Retired Teacher, 65 years

C/o. K. Narasimha Swamy

H.No. 5-4-240, Maruthinagar

Karimnagar Dist.                                                                                                                                                        Sri Radhampu Kanaka Chary

Advocate, Enrolment No. 1543/91

H.No. 2-10-1022, Jyothinagar

Karimnagar-505                                      

Counsel for the Appellant                

Counsel for the Respondent            

F.A. 

Between:

Sri Radhampu Kanaka Chary

Advocate, Enrolment No. 1543/91

H.No. 2-10-1022, Jyothinagar

Karimnagar-505                                                                                                

                                                         Rangu Dakshina Murthy

S/o. Ramaswamy

Retired Teacher, 65 years

C/o. K. Narasimha Swamy

H.No. 5-4-240, Maruthinagar

Karimnagar Dist.          

Counsel for the Appellant                KrishnaCounsel for the Respondent            

QUORUM: 

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO, PRESIDENT

&

SMT. M. SHREESHA, MEMBER

THURSDAY, THIS THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

Oral Order ( Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

Aggrieved by the order in C.D. No. 146/2006   

The appeals arise in this way.       

Opposite Party/respondent resisted the case. He admitted    Actually, the MRO mutated the land earlier     

registration i.e., 1995.                

When the     inclusive of travelling expenses to appear before RDO, Karimnagar and MRO, Manakondur. He never promised that he would take favourable orders and complete his work.       with the same allegations  

Based on the evidence   

Aggrieved by the said order,          

The complainant contends       

On the other hand            

It is not in dispute that the complainant had engaged the services of opposite party an advocate for initiating proceedings before the revenue authorities for getting his name    

The complainant has not filed the order copy of the MRO, Manakondur or RDO, Karimnagar to show that the opposite party did not appear before the said officials.  

It is pertinent to note that opposite party      From this we are             

As there is no deficiency in  opposite party.      

         PRESIDENT