Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/238/2015

R. Yogeswaran - Complainant(s)

Versus

Rams Arumugam - Opp.Party(s)

K. Murugan

16 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE       Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                          PRESIDENT

                    Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.238/2015

(Against the Order dt.04.06.2015 made in C.C. No.44/2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Namakkal)

                         DATED THE 16th   DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021                                                        

R. Yogeswaran,

RAJ Cable,

24-E, Omsakthi Illam,

1st Street, Ashok Nagar,

Thirunagar, Mohanur Road,

Namakkal-637 002.                                                 .. Appellant/1st  Opposite Party.

-Vs-

 

  1. Rama. Arumugam,

Joint Secretary,

Tamilnadu Payaneetaalar Sangam,

No.44/45, Selambannan Street,

Sandaipettai Puthur,

Namakkal - 637 002.

 

  1. Tamilnadu Payaneetalar Sangam,

Rep. by its Present Secretary,

Ka. Subbarayan... Respondent/Complainant.

 

  1. M. Madheswari,

Assistant Manager, (Cable TV),

Tamilnadu Govt. Cable TV Corpn. Ltd.,

12.D.2, Karuppannan Street,

Paramathi Salai,

Namakkal-637 002.… 3rd Respondent/ 2nd Opposite party.

 

Counsel for the Appellant             :  M/s. K. Murugan

Counsel for 1st Respondent          :  M/s. Profexs Associates

Respondent 2 & 3                      :  Served called absent.

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 16.11.2021 and  this Commission made the following:-

 

Docket order

 

          No representation for appellant. 1st Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of 1st Respondent & for filing written argument of appellant & 1st Respondent & for arguments in list. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.15 pm, then also the appellant has not appeared and the written arguments were not filed. Hence keeping the appeal pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

          Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

 

              Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                   R.SUBBIAH                       

            MEMBER                                                                                 PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.