Complainant/respondent purchased bajra/millet seeds for Rs.1125/- and Rs.1050/- on 4.6.2009 and 12.6.2009 from Haryana Beej Centre (Opposite party No.2) which were produced/manufactured by the petitioner.  Respondent sowed the seeds in 10 acres of land.  Many types of bajra/millet grew in the land.  Respondent made complaint to the petitioner but nothing was done.  Respondent thereafter approached Dy.Director (Agriculture) to send a team to inspect the fields which reported on 6.10.2009 that Bajra/millet of HHB-197 was sown in the fields but there was difference of tillering in the plants; balls of the plants were not equals; they were 4-12 inches in height and there was difference of 40-50%. 

Respondent, being aggrieved, filed complaint before the District Forum which allowed the same and directed the petitioner to pay Rs.75,000/- to the respondent towards compensation within one month.

        Petitioner being aggrieved filed appeal before the State Commission.  Notice was issued for 17.10.2011.  On the adjourned date of hearing, respondent appeared in person but the petitioner did not appear.  State Commission has noted in its order that the case was called several times but no one appeared for the petitioner.  Keeping in view the pendency of the appeals/complaints, State Commission did not think it appropriate to adjourn the appeal and proceeded to decide the same.  State Commission, by the impugned order, has endorsed the view taken by the District Forum.

        Finding recorded by the fora below is a finding of fact, which does not call for any interference.  Dismissed.