Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/61/2018

G.Enancheliyan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ramaraj Company showroom - Opp.Party(s)

Party In Person-Applt.,

21 Feb 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/61/2018
( Date of Filing : 26 Mar 2018 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. G.Enancheliyan
Hosoor , Krishnagiri 635109
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Ramaraj Company showroom
Byepass Road, Hosur 635109
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

               BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                  Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                           ::      MEMBER

 

FA.No. 61/2018

  (Against the order in C.C. No.25/2017 dated 21.2.2018 on the file of the DCDRC, Krishnagiri)

   DATED THE 21st  DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

 

 G.Elanchlian,

47A, Nehru Road,

Thinnur, Hosur,

Krishnagiri District – 635 109                                                    ..Appellant/complainant

                                                    Vs

1.The Proprietor

Ramraj Cotton Showroom,

6/25B1, Near ICICI Bank,

Krishnagiri By-pass Road,

Hosur – 635 109  

 

2. The proprietor,

Ramraj cotton,

Senkunthapuram,

Mangalam Road,

Tirupur -4                                                                  ..Respondents /opposite parties

 

For Appellant                                          : Party in person

Counsel for Respondents /opposite parties  : M/s V.Rameshvel

 

          This appeal coming on before us for hearing today for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of Respondent and for arguments in list or for dismissal, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                                                 Docket order

          No representation for Appellant in person. Respondents present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of Respondent and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When this matter was called at 11.00A.M, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, but the appellant was again not present. Since the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the appeal is dismissed for default. No cost.

 

           Sd/-                                                                                                         Sd/- 

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT

 

 

 

    

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.