Bihar

StateCommission

RP/7/2023

Md. Aslam Ansari & Anr. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ram Pravesh Sah & Anr. - Opp.Party(s)

Adv. Ratnesh Prasad

14 Aug 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
BIHAR, PATNA
FINAL ORDER
 
Revision Petition No. RP/7/2023
( Date of Filing : 13 Jul 2023 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/31/2013 of District Muzaffarpur)
 
1. Md. Aslam Ansari & Anr.
aged about 45 years, Son of Md. Abdul Ghaffar, Proprietor Ekbalia Traders, Resident of Etwarpur Taj, Surfuddinpur, PS- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Ram Pravesh Sah & Anr.
Male, Son of Late Kapildeo Sah, Village & Post- Adigopalpur, PS- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PRESIDENT
  MD. SHAMIM AKHTAR JUDICIAL MEMBER
  RAM PRAWESH DAS MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 14 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION

BIHAR, PATNA

Revision Petition No. 07 of 2023

 

1. Md. Aslam Ansari, Male aged about 45 years, S/o- Md. Abdul Ghaffar, Proprietor Ekbalia Traders, Resident of Etwarpur, Taj Surfuddinpur, PS- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur

2. Md. Firoz Alam, Male, aged about 30 years, S/o- Md. Hasim Ansari, Sales Man Edwalia Traders, Resident of Etwarpur Taj Surfuddinpur, PS- Bchahan, District- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                                                                       …  Appellants/Opposite Parties

Versus

1.  Ram Pravesh Sah, Male, S/o- Late Kapildeo Sah

2.  Pankaj Kumar, Male, S/o- Ram Pravesh Sah, both resident of Village & PO- Adigopalpur, PS- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                                                                               …. Petitioners/Respondents

Counsel for the Appellant: Adv. Ratneshwar Prasad

Counsel for the Respondent:

 

Before,

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar, President

Md. Shamim Akhtar, Member

Ram Prawesh Das, Member

 

 

 

Dated 14.08.2023

As per Md. Shamim Akhtar, Member.

O r d e r

 

  1. Heard the Ld. Lawyer for the Revisionist. Perused the records.
  2. The revisionist has filed the instant revision application against the order dated 18.08.2022 passed by the Ld. District Commission, Muzaffarpur in Complaint no. 31 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the prayer for the recall of the witness engineer for cross examination by the revisionist has been rejected.
  3. We have gone through the impugned order. Ld. District Commission has assigned reasons in passing the impugned order. Moreover, there is no provision under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to recall a witness for cross examination who has been duly discharged. We do not find any illegality in passing the impugned order. As such the instant revision application is not admitted for hearing and is dismissed at the admission stage itself.  

 

(Md. Shamim Akhtar)                                                                   (Ram Prawesh Das)                                  (Sanjay Kumar,J)

             Member                                                                                           Member                                                  President

 

 

Md. Fariduzzama

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ MD. SHAMIM AKHTAR]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ RAM PRAWESH DAS]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.