Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/551/2015

Uppcl - Complainant(s)

Versus

Rajnarain Saxena - Opp.Party(s)

Deepak Mehrotra

24 May 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/551/2015
( Date of Filing : 23 Mar 2015 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/02/2015 in Case No. C/65/2014 of District Bareilly-II)
 
1. Uppcl
Bareilly
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Rajnarain Saxena
Bareilly
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vijai Varma PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Raj Kamal Gupta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 24 May 2018
Final Order / Judgement

ORAL

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

U.P., Lucknow.

Appeal No. 551 of 2015

Executive Engineer, EDD-I, Kadju Marg,

Bareilly.                                                          ..Appellant.

Versus

Raj Narain Saxena s/o Late Chail Behari Lal Saxena,

R/o House no.219, Kaherwan, Biharipur,

Thana Kotwali, Bareilly.                        ….Respondent.

 

Present:

Hon'ble Mr. Vijai Varma, Presiding Member.

Hon'ble Mr. Raj Kamal Gupta, Member.

Shri Deepak Mehrotra for the appellant.

None for the respondent.  

Date:  24.5.2018

ORDER

(Delivered by Sri Vijai Varma,  Member)

Case called out. Counsel for the appellant Shri Deepak Mehrotra appeared and sought time to make up the short comings in the filing this appeal.

It transpires that this appeal was filied on 23.3.2015 i.e. about more than 3 years back and since then the defects in filing the appellant are not being removed. Even, a defect like compliance with the Proviso 2 of Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act whereby it is mandatory to deposit 50% of the decretal amount or Rs.25,000.00 which ever is less, has not been complied with, even though innumerable opportunities have been given for the purpose. In fact, many a times a last opportunity was given to remove the defect, otherwise this appeal may be dismissed. But, still this defect has not been removed, therefore, there is no option but to dismiss this appeal as defective at the admission stage.

 It is accordingly, dismissed.

Certified copy of the order be provided to the parties in accordance with rules.

 

 

            (Vijai Varma)                   (Raj Kamal Gupta)

         Presiding Member                       Member

Jafri PA II  Court No.2

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vijai Varma]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Raj Kamal Gupta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.