West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

CC/11/210

Manab Kumar Sarkar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Rajlakshmi Guinea Museum Jewellers Pt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

20 Feb 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/11/210
 
1. Manab Kumar Sarkar
105, Kamarpara 1st Lane, Kolkata-700103.
Kolkata
WB
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Rajlakshmi Guinea Museum Jewellers Pt. Ltd.
181, Rash Behari Avenue, Kolkata-700019.
Kolkata
WB
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. Sankar Nath Das PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. Dr. A.B. Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

In  the  Court  of  the

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit -I, Kolkata,

8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, Kolkata-700087.

 

CDF/Unit-I/Case No.   210 / 2011.

 

1)                   Sri Manab Kumar Sarkar,

105. Kumarpara 1st Lane, Kolkata-700103.                                               ---------- Complainant

 

---Versus---

 

1)                   Rajlakshmi Guinea Museum Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. @ Raj Lakshmi Gold,

181, Rashbehari Avenue, Kolkata-700019.                                              ---------- Opposite Party

 

Present :           Sri Sankar Nath Das, President.

                        Dr. A. B. Chakraborty, Member

                                        

Order No.   10    Dated  20/02/2012.

 

The petition of complaint u/s 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 has been filed by the complainant Sri Manab Kumar. Sarkar against the o.p. Rajlakshmi Guinea Museum Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. The case of the complainant in short is that on 14.2.11 complainant purchased one gold chain (22/22) R of Rs.27,600/- by cash including of charges from the o.p. vide memo no.10CM0309 dt.14.2.11 on the occasion of self marriage ceremony and gifted the chain to his wife but after few days the said chain started break in and the complainant had been to the show room of o.p. several times but they did not pay heed to his complaint. Thereafter complainant sent a lawyer’s notice on 16.5.11 to o.p. and o.p. received on 18.5.11 but o.p. did not send any reply. Hence the instant case lodged by the complainant against the o.p. being a service provider to its consumer / complainant.

O.p. has not entered in this case by filing w/v and as such the matter was heard ex parte.

Decision with reasons:-

We have gone through the pleadings of the complainant, evidence and documents in particular and it appears to us that o.p. did not challenge the evidence of complainant by cross examining the same and as such the evidence of complainant remains undemolished and amounts to unchallenged testimony. As such, we are of the view that there is sufficient deficiency on the part of the o.p. as apparent from the record to its consumer / complainant and complainant is entitled to relief as prayed for.

 Hence, ordered,

The petition of complaint is allowed ex parte against the o.p. with cost. O.p. is directed to pay a sum of Rs.27,600/- (Rupees twenty seven thousand six hundred) only together with interest @ 9% p.a. from 14.2.11 till the date of realization. O.p. further directed to pay compensation of Rs.7000/- (Rupees seven thousand) only for harassment and mental agony and litigation cost of Rs.3000/- (Rupees three thousand) only within 45 days from the date of communication of this order, i.d. an interest @ 9% p.a. shall accrue over the entire sum due to the credit of the complainant.

Supply certified copy of this order to the parties.

 

 

 

   _____Sd-____                                                    _______Sd-_______

     MEMBER                                                           PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Sankar Nath Das]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Dr. A.B. Chakraborty]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.