Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

EA/08/12

Continental Average - Complainant(s)

Versus

Rajiv Piramal & Etar - Opp.Party(s)

15 Nov 2010

ORDER

 
Execution Application No. EA/08/12
 
1. Continental Average
Mumbai
Maharastra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Rajiv Piramal & Etar
Mumbai
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

Both the parties are absent. Applicant/Org.Complainant is absent since 18/11/2009. He has not filed his written argument. Hence, Execution Application is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.