Bihar

StateCommission

A/234/2016

Electrical Engineer, Buxar & Ors - Complainant(s)

Versus

Rajiv Kumar - Opp.Party(s)

Adv. Vikash Chandra Srivastava

29 Jul 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
BIHAR, PATNA
FINAL ORDER
 
First Appeal No. A/234/2016
(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/01/2016 in Case No. CC/82/2014 of District Buxar)
 
1. Electrical Engineer, Buxar & Ors
Executive Engineer, Buxar, Assistant Engineer, Junior Engineer, West Urban Area, Buxar South Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Electric Supply Division, Buxar, PS- Buxar (City)
Buxar
Bihar
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Rajiv Kumar
Rajiv Kumar son of Ram Pravesh Singh, resident of Musafirganj, PO- Gajadharganj, Ward No. 10, Thana- Buxar (Town), Dist- Buxar
Buxar
Bihar
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Shailesh Kumar Sinha PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Upendra Jha MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Renu Sinha MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 29 Jul 2017
Final Order / Judgement

ORDER

Date of order:    31-07-2017

Upendra Jha, Member       

1.                          This appeal is directed against the order dated 19-01-2016 passed by District Consumer Forum; Buxar in Complaint Case No. 82 of 2014 by which the appellants are directed to reduce the power load from 2 K.W, to one K.W. to correct the bill without DPS and to restore the electric connection and to pay Rs.5000/- as compensation within 45 days failing which 8% interest is payable.

2.                                 Brief facts of this case is that the respondent had 2 Kilo watt electric consumption for running Compute Institute. On 11-02-2013 in January 2014 a bill of Rs. 7,253/- was received for which he approached the appellant to correct the bill. As the Computer Institute had been closed, hence he also applied to reduce load from 2 kilo Watt to one Kilo Watt. But, it was not done. A complaint was filed before the District Forum.The O.ps.-appellants contested the case. The District Forum passed the impugned order against which this appeal is preferred.

3.                          Respective written notes of arguments have been filed. Heard and perused the District Forum order

4.                          The counsel for the appellants submit that the complainant is not a ‘Consumer’ as he was running a Computer Institute for Business purposes. For reducing the load, neither the previous dues was cleared nor the required charge was deposited. There is no deficiency in its part. This point was not considered by the District Forum. Hence, the order is fit to be set aside.

5.                          The counsel for the respondent submits that the appellants have committed wrong and a wrong bill was issued to the complainant. In this connection no D.P.S. should be charged. District Forum order is proper and justified. It needs no interference. The appeal be dismissed.

6.                                   Having considered the grounds of appeal, submissions of the parties and on perusal of the order passed by the District Forum, it appears that the District Forum has not considered the matter in right perspective. The wrong Bill was to be rectified after proper verification but it cannot be rectified without DPS. As some required charge was not deposited by the complainant for reducing the load from 2 Kilo watt to one kilo watt, hence, it was not reduced. There seems no deficiency on the part of the O.ps.-appellants. Hence, direction to pay Rs.5000/- is not proper. Hence, the District Forum order is set aside and the appeal is allowed. The respondent may represent before the appellants regarding his grievances within one month from the receipt of this order and the appellants shall take decision properly within further one month.

7.                          The appeal is allowed.

 

 

S.K.Sinha                                                                        Upendra Jha

President                                                                               Member (M)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      

                                                                                                                                                                     

Anita

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Shailesh Kumar Sinha]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Upendra Jha]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Renu Sinha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.