04.08.2021

ORDER

Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.        The appellant/Opposite Party filed this appeal way back in the year 2012 being aggrieved by the Order dt.29.06.2012 passed in CC.No.37/2012 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bagalkot wherein the District Commission has partly allowed the complaint which directed the Opposite Party to pay an amount of Rs.96,268/- to the complainant along with Rs.5,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.500/- towards costs of litigation within two months from the date of receipt of the Order.  Failing which, the amount shall carry interest at 10% p.a. from the date of the Order, till payment.

2.        The appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law. 

3.        The case called twice, appellant not present.

4.        We have perused the appeal memo.  Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant.  As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed.  Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

Forward free copies to both parties.

              Sd/-                                                        Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

KCS*