Narayanan mudali filed a consumer case on 30 Aug 2008 against rajan in the Palakkad Consumer Court. The case no is CC/08/6 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
Kerala
Palakkad
CC/08/6
Narayanan mudali - Complainant(s)
Versus
rajan - Opp.Party(s)
30 Aug 2008
ORDER
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM Civil Station, Palakkad, Kerala Pin:678001 Tel : 0491-2505782 consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/6
Narayanan mudali
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
rajan
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
1. Seena.H
Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Civil Station, Palakkad 678001, Kerala Dated this the 30th day of August, 2008 Present: Smt.Seena.H, President C.C.No.06/2008 Narayana Muthali, S/o.Arunachala Muthali, Olassery, Kodumbu, Palakkad - Complainant (By K.Sasidharan, Advocate) Vs Rajan, S/o.Veemban, Kangadparambil, Thiruvalathur, Palakkad. - Opposite party. O R D E R By Smt.Seena.H, President The case of the complainant in brief is as follows: The complainant herein, entrusted a motor pump set for repairing to the opposite party on 05/06/2007. Opposite party has removed and taken away the bush and other parts of the pump and promised to repair and refit the same within a week. Rs.550/- (Rupees Five hundred and fifty only) was also paid in advance. The pump set was used by the complainant for agricultural purposes. The opposite party neither repaired the pump set nor repaid the advance amount. A registered notice was issued. But the opposite party did not accept the notice. According to the complainant the afore mentioned act of opposite party amounts to deficiency in service. Hence the complainant has approached before this forum seeking an order directing the opposite party to refund the advance amount of Rs.550/- (Rupees Five hundred and fifty only) along with Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) as compensation for deficiency in service. Notice served. The opposite party failed to appear before the forum inspite of accepting the notice. Hence set ex-parte. The evidence of the complainant consists of the proof affidavit, Ext.A1 lawyer notice and postal receipt and Ext.A2 (series) returned notice and acknowledgement. There is no evidence contrary to the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the forum holds the view that the act of the opposite party in not effecting repair amounts to deficiency in service. Complaint allowed. Opposite party is directed to pay Rs.550/- (Rupees Five hundred and fifty only), the advance amount collected, Rs.1,500/- (Rupees One thousand and five hundred only) as compensation and Rs.250/- (Rupees Two hundred and fifty only) as cost within a month from the date of receipt of this order failing which the complainant is entitled to get the whole amount along with 12% interest p.a from the date of order till realisation. Pronounced in the open court on this the 30th day of August, 2008 Sd/- Seena.H President APPENDIX Exhibits marked on the side of complainant Ext.A1 Copy of lawyer notice and postal receipt Ext.A2 (Series) Returned notice and acknowledgement. Exhibits marked on the side of opposite party Nil Cost (Allowed) Rs.250/- (Rupees Two hundred and fifty only) allowed as cost to the complainant Forwarded/By Order, Senior Superintendent
......................Seena.H
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.