DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.

CC No: 392/2018

JAI BHAGWAN                                   … COMPLAINANT

Versus

RAJ TELECOM & ORS.                                      … OPPOSITE PARTY (IES)

COMPLAINT U/S 12 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986

CORAM:SH. M.K. GUPTA, PRESIDENT

SH. BARIQ AHMED, MEMBER

       MS. USHA KHANNA, MEMBER

ORDER                       Date: 10.07.2018

SH. BARIQ AHMED, MEMBER

Perused file. It is true that none is appearing for the complainant since last dates of hearings i.e. 03.07.2018 & 10.07.2018 consecutively. Several calls have been given since morning. But none on behalf of the complainant has appeared. Moreover, despite giving opportunities the complainant has failed to address arguments on the maintainability of the case.

It appears that the complainant is not interested in pursuing his case. It will be abuse of process to proceed further in the absence of the complainant. Hence complaint is dismissed in default for the reasons mentioned above. File be consigned to record room.

Announced on this 10^TH day of July, 2018.

(MEMBER)                          (MEMBER)                              (PRESIDENT)