Manipur

StateCommission

MA/3/2018

Mr. Sarat Rai - Complainant(s)

Versus

Raj Medicity,The Managing Partner, represented by Shri H.rajen and another - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.Ng.Somorjit Singh

02 Apr 2018

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
(STATE COMMISSION)
IMPHAL
MANIPUR
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/3/2018
( Date of Filing : 23 Feb 2018 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/3/2016
 
1. Mr. Sarat Rai
Kanglatombi Bazar
Imphal West
Manipur
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Raj Medicity,The Managing Partner, represented by Shri H.rajen and another
north AOC
Imphal West
Manipur
2. Dr.W.Motilal Singh,Consultant ,Raj Medicity
North AOC
Imphal West
Manipur
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.Nandakumar PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. A.Nibedita Devi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr.Ng.Somorjit Singh, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Mr.L.Indrakumar Singh, Advocate for the Respondent 1
 Mr.Kh.Iboyaima Singh, Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 02 Apr 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Mr.Haobijam Rajen, Managing Director of the Respondent No.1 and also Mr. Sarat Rai, the complainant appeared in person before this Commission. Heard Mr. Ng Somorjit Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Complainant and Mr. L .Indrakumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.

It is the submission of the learned counsels appearing for the parties that the Respondent No. 2,Dr.W. Motilal Singh, Consultant is indisposed as such both the parties prayed for dispensing his personal appearance. Accordingly, the personal appearance of Respondent No.2 is hereby dispensed.

A joint application dated 02/04/2018 signed by the parties i.e. the Complainant and the Respondent No.1 as well as counsels had been filed before this Commission. In Para 5 of the application, it is stated that the matter had been settled amicably outside the Commissiion subject to payment of certain amount of compensation by the respondents to the complainant. It is also further stated that the said amount of compensation settled amicably had already been paid by the respondents and also the complainant had already received the said amount of cvompensation. This fact is ascertained from the complainant, Shri Sarart Rai who appeared in person before this Commissiion. Shri Sarat Rai also stated clearly before this commission that the matter had been settled amicably outside the Commission by receiving a certain amount of compensation. He also stated that he had received the said amount on 23/02/2018.

This being the situation, the Complaint case is disposed of on compromise.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.Nandakumar]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. A.Nibedita Devi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.