Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/488/2010

Madan Gupta - Complainant(s)

Versus

Raj Hans Photo Centre - Opp.Party(s)

01 Oct 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 488 of 2010
1. Madan GuptaS/o Sh. Faqir Chand R/o HOuse No. 223 Sector-49/A Advocate Society Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Raj Hans Photo CentreSCO No.-4 SEctor-17/E Chandigarh Through its Manager Proprietor2. Manager Nokia Care Centre Quiet OfficeNo.-7 SEctor-35/A Chandigarh3. Manager Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.5F Tower A & B Cybergreen DLF Cyber City SEctor-25/A, Gurgaon-122002 Haryana ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 01 Oct 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

           

                                   

Complaint Case No. 488 of 2010

 

Madan Gupta, son of Sh.Faqir Chand, r/o House No. 223, Sector 49-A, Advocate Society, Chandigarh  

- Complainant

                                               

Versus

 

  1. Raj Hans Photo Centre, Chandigarh.
  2. Manager, Nokia Care Centre, Chandigarh
  3. Manager, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon

-          Opposite Parties

 

Present:           None  for complainant.

                        OP-1 ex-parte.

                        Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv. for OP-2.

                        None for OP-3.

 

Dated, the 1th day of October, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        A few days back Counsel for the complainant came and left application for withdrawal of the complaint as the matter has been settled between the parties. Accordinlgy, the complaint is allowed to be withdrawn.                 

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING MEMBER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

                                    2nd MEMBER                                   1st MEMBER



DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,