Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/12/129

Mani Subramanian - Complainant(s)

Versus

Railway Commercial Clerk - Opp.Party(s)

Shajid Kammadam, Kasaragod

15 Jun 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/129
 
1. Mani Subramanian
S/o. UmamaheswariAyyar, R/at Karyasseri Madam, Subramanya Swami Temple, East Nada, Payyanur
Kannur
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Railway Commercial Clerk
Kasaragod Railway Station, Kasaragod
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE P.Ramadevi Member
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

                                                                            Date of filing   :  30-04-2012 

                                                                            Date of order  :   08  -06-2012

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                CC.129/2012

                         Dated this, the  8th     day of   June    2012

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                             : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                      : MEMBER

SMT. K.G.BEENA                                        : MEMBER

 

Mani Subramanian,                                                   } Complainant.

S/o.Uma Maheswariayyar,

R/at Karyasseri Madom,

Subramania Swami Temple, East Nada,

Payyanur. 670307

(Adv.Shajid Kammadam, Kerala)

 

Railway Commercial Clerk,                                 } Opposite party

Kasaragod Railway Station, Kasaragod.

(In Person)

                                                            O R D E R

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ, PRESIDENT

 

            Shorn of all unnecessaries the case of complainant is that the opposite party is insisting him to sign some declaration not in prescribed manner as a pre-requisite for renewal of his  season ticket to travel by train in the route Payyanur -Kasaragod. According to him such a declaration is not mandated in any of the railway rules and therefore it is illegal.

2.         According to Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway, Palakkad who prepared and signed the version  on behalf of the opposite party, the Railway Commercial clerk, Kasaragod Railway Station, the complaint is bad for non-joinder of General Manager and Chief Commercial Manager, Southern Railway, H.Q office, Park Town Chennai 600003,  the authorities who controls and manages the commercial activities of the Zonal railway and Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway Palakkad Division, Palakkad who regulates and manages the commercial activities of Palakkad Division.

3.         The Railway commercial clerk, the opposite party herein is not vested with any power in the commercial activities of the Railway Administration other than the duties entrusted to him from time to time and therefore he is not the proper opposite party.  The cause for obtaining such declaration was necessitated due to indiscriminate misuse  of the facilities of First Class Season Ticket holders by traveling in reserved first class coaches in which the first class season ticket journey is not permitted as stated in the season ticket itself.  Besides the first class season ticket holders had pick up quarrel with the ticket checking staff and also with the passengers who had planned their journey in advance in first class coaches. At present  a Writ Petition is  pending before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala by the First Class Season ticket holders Association, Kozhikode challenging the order issued by Divisional Railway Manager (Commercial) Southern Railway Palakkad (DMR/C/PGT) regarding the issue of first  class season tickets.  The Forum is not vested with the power to decide whether a rule made by the respondent by the Railway Administration as per the provisions of Section 60 of Railway Act 1989 chapter No.8 is maintainable or not.     The demand to fill up and submit the declaration form for the issue of first class season tickets is not arbitrary and there is no harassment as alleged in the prayer.  The opposite party tried  only to implement the formalities/guidelines in vogue for issue of first class season tickets.  The complainant himself is responsible for not getting enrolled himself as an authorized first class season ticket holder duly complying the formalities and there was  no denial of issuing   first class season tickets  by the opposite party. Hence according to the opposite party the complaint is liable to be dismissed.

4.         Both sides heard.  The  documents produced by the complainant are  marked as Ext.A1 & A2.  The opposite parties produced Exts B1 to B3 in support of their contentions.

5.         The following are the points arises for consideration.

            1.  Whether demanding  the declaration form as per the circular issued by the

                 railway authority is legal & whether it amounts to deficiency in service ?

 

2.      What relief as to costs & compensation?

6.           According to learned counsel for complainant Sri.Shajid Kammadam asking  to fill up a declaration is without any lawful authority and  hence it amounts to deficiency in service.

7.         According to opposite party the declaration is necessitated due to the indiscriminate misuse of the facilities by First Class Season Ticket holders by traveling in reserved coaches and the same is obtained  as per Exts B1 & B2 letters.  Proforma of declaration is marked as Ext.B3.  According to opposite party they have the authority to issue such circulars or rules as per Sec.60  of the Railway Act.

8.         We carefully perused Sec.60 of the Railway Act 1989.  Sec.60 says that the Central Government may by notification make rules to carry out the purpose of this chapter a such rules  for all or any of the following matters.

            a) the convenience and accommodation(including the reservation of seats or

               berths in trains) to passengers’

           b) the amount of refund for the cancellation of a ticket.

           c) the circumstances under which changes of names of passengers, having

               reserved seats or berths, may be permitted;

           d) the carriage of luggage  and the conditions subject to which luggage may be kept

                in the cloak-rooms at the stations’

           e) diseases which are infectious or contagious;

           f)  the conditions subject to which a railway administration may carry passengers

               suffering from infectious or contagious diseases and the manner in which

               carriage used by such passengers may be disinfected;

           g) generally, for regulating the travelling upon, and the use, working and

               management of the railways.

9.         From a bare reading  itself it is clear that the railway authorities shall notify any rules made as per the powers conferred under this chapter.

10.       The opposite party has no case that the circular issued as per that every season ticket holder has to submit the declaration form is a notified rule.  In the absence of   such a  notification, the circular is illegal and unsustainable in the eye of law and therefore it is legally unenforceable.  Moreover, the season tickets issued itself contain an endorsement in which it is specifically mentioned that ‘VALID BY UNRESERVED FIRST CLASS ONLY’ since such an endorsement is made on every season tickets it is quite unnecessary to obtain Ext.B3 declaration. Therefore we are of the opinion that non renewing of the   season ticket for want of Ext.B3 declaration is a deficiency in service on the part of opposite party.

            In the result, complaint is allowed and opposite party is directed to renew the first  class season ticket of the complainant if it is not expired without obtaining any declaration form and if it is expired issue a fresh season ticket without obtaining any declaration form.  In the circumstances there is no order as to costs.  Send a copy of the order to Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway, Palghat.

 

      Sd/-                                    Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

MEMBER                               MEMBER                                                       PRESIDENT

Exts.

A1. Copy of ticket

A2. Copy of the identity card.

B1.21-03-2012 copy of letter

B2. 28-03-2012 copy of order.

B3. Declaration to be furnished at the time of purchase of first class season ticket.

 

 

      Sd/-                                    Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

MEMBER                               MEMBER                                                       PRESIDENT

                                                                                                Forwarded by Order

 

 

                                                                                       SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

Pj/

 

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE P.Ramadevi]
Member
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.