Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/10/115

AMOL SATISH JAMNER - Complainant(s)

Versus

RAHUL ASHOKRAO DESHMUKH - Opp.Party(s)

SAQU KIRAN SABOO

06 Apr 2011

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR
5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001
 
First Appeal No. A/10/111
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. CC/137/09 of District )
 
1. AMOL SATISH JAMNER
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
AMARAVAI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SACHIN PADMAKAR DHAMANKAR
SHANTRINAGAR ARNI TAH ARNI
YAVATMAL
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/10/101
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. CC/135/09 of District )
 
1. AMOL SATISH JAMNER
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. LATA KASHIRAM INGOLE
MANA KURUM TAH MURTIZAPUR
AKOLA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/10/112
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. CC/130/09 of District )
 
1. AMOL SATISH JAMNER
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SABOPARAG VIJAY THAKARE
ANAND NAGAR AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/10/113
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. CC/132/09 of District )
 
1. AMOL SATISH JAMNER
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SAGAR ASHOKRAO BUTE
BRAMHAPURI MAIN ROAD AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/10/114
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. CC/131/09 of District )
 
1. AMOL SATISH JAMNER
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. GAJANAN DAYARAM SATOTE
SANGAMPUR TAHSIL ROAD SANGAMPUR
AMARAVATI
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/10/115
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. CC/133/09 of District )
 
1. AMOL SATISH JAMNER
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. RAHUL ASHOKRAO DESHMUKH
AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/10/116
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. cc/134/2009 of District )
 
1. Amol satish Jamner
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
AMARAVATI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Rupesh SureshraO kalbande
SHIVNATGAR RING ROAD WARUD
AMARAVATI
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/10/117
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2009 in Case No. cc/10/117 of District )
 
1. AMOL SATISH JAMNER
19,SHAILA VASANT HOLLYWOOD COLONY KATHORA ROAD AMARAVATI
amaravati
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. mahesh madhukarrao mate
Nerparsopant TAH Nerparsopant
YAVATMAL
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  HON'BLE P.N.KASHALKAR PRESIDING MEMBER
  HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:SAU KIRAN SABOO, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
ORDER

ORAL ORDER
(Passed on 06/04/2011)
 
          In all these appeals no notice was issued to the respondent. Appellants state that dispute in these appeal is settled. Hence they want to withdraw the appeals unconditionally. Amount deposited in each appeal be refunded back to the appellant.   Hence the following order.
                                                   ORDER
 
1.        Appellants are permitted to withdraw all these appeals.
2.       As such appeals are dismissed.
3.       The amounts deposited by the appellant be refunded back to     the appellant by the  Registrar  of  this Commission.
 
 
 

 
 
[ HON'BLE P.N.KASHALKAR]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.