Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/108/2017

M.V.Geetha - Complainant(s)

Versus

R.R.P.Housing Private Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

N Maheswaraiah

02 Aug 2019

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 27.02.2017                                                                          Date of Order  : 02.08.2019

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                     : PRESIDENT

TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP.  :  MEMBER

 

C.C. No.108/2017

DATED THIS FRIDAY THE 02^ND DAY OF AUGUST 2019

M.U. Geetha,

D/o. Mr. P.N. Unni,

Flat No.76/34, Amuthani Apts., D-1,

Vinayakam Street,

Venkateshwara Nagar,

Virugambakkam,

Chennai – 600 092.                                                .. Complainant.

..Versus..

 

1. R.R.P. Housing Private Limited,

Represented by its Managing Director

Mr. N. Padmanaban,

S/o. Mr. Nataraja Pillai,

 

2. Mr. N. Padmanaban,

S/o. Mr. Nataraja Pillai,

Managing Director,

 

3. Mr. P. Tamil,

S/o. Mr. N. Padmanaban,

Director,

 

Opposite parties are 2 to 4 having office at:

No.50, 10^th Avenue,

Ashok Nagar,

Chennai – 600 083.                                               .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                  :  M/s. K.J. Saravanan &

                                                                   others

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 to 3 :  M/s. V. Usha Rani

                                           ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to return the amount of Rs.7,00,000/- paid to the opposite parties and to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards compensation for deficiency in service, financial loss, mental stress and agony with cost to the complainant.

Proof Affidavit of the complainant and opposite parties 1 to 3 are not filed for a long time to prove the allegations in the complaint and contentions raised in the written version. Both complainant and the opposite parties 1 to 3 and their respective Counsels absent for a long time.  Hence, this complaint is dismissed for default.

Dated this Friday the 02^nd day of August 2019.

 

 

MEMBER                                                                      PRESIDENT