Telangana

Medak

CC/16/2011

M.RAGHU RAM S/O SATYANARAYANA - Complainant(s)

Versus

R.NAGARAJU PROPRIETOR HIMAALAYA MARKETING DISTRICT STOKIEST - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

27 Jun 2011

ORDER

CAUSE TITLE AND
JUDGEMENT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/2011
 
1. M.RAGHU RAM S/O SATYANARAYANA
H.NO.MIG.75,MEDAK MEDAK DISTRICT
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. R.NAGARAJU PROPRIETOR HIMAALAYA MARKETING DISTRICT STOKIEST
AUTO NAGAR MEDAK ,MEDAK DISTRICT
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Meena Ramanathan PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. G. Sreenivas Rao MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

No representation on either side. both parties are called absent. Complainant has not filed his evidence affidavit even though five adjournments are granted. He filed this case to direct the opposite parties to replace water purifier by new one as the water purifier purchased by him is damaged. As the complainant is not turning up to prosecute the matter, it appears that he is not interested in the case. The complaint is therefore dismissed. No costs.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Meena Ramanathan]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. G. Sreenivas Rao]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.