Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/670/2007

Sahara India Parviar Housing Unit - Complainant(s)

Versus

R.K. Sharma - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Navjinder Singh Sidhu (Adv)

09 Jun 2014

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/670/2007
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/539/2006 of District )
 
1. Sahara India Parviar Housing Unit
Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. , Sahara India Tower , 7, Kapporthala Complex, Lucknow through its M.D.
2. B.M.
Sahara India Pariwar ,SCO 1110-1111 ,SEctor 22 Chandigarh
3. Regional Manager
Sahara India Pariwar ,SCO 1110-1111 ,Chandigarh through its R.M
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. R.K. Sharma
s/o Late Sri Gyan Chand , H.No. 158/1, Sector 45-A , Chandigarh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.] PRESIDENT
  DEV RAJ MEMBER
  PADMA PANDEY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

 

First Appeal No.

670 of 2007

Date of Institution

05.10.2007

Date of Decision  

09.06.2014

 

 

1.Sahara India Pariwar Housing Unit, Sahara India Commercial Corporation Limited, Sahara India Tower, 7, Kapoorthala Complex, Lucknow through its Managing Director.

2.Regional Manager, Sahara India Pariwar, SCO No.1110-1111, Sector 22-, Chandigarh through its Regional Manager.

3.The Branch Manager, Sahara India Pariwar, SCO No.1110-1111, Sector 22, Chandigarh.

All are represented by the Branch Manager, Sahara India Pariwar, SCO No.1110-1111, Sector 22, Chandigarh.

 

…..Appellants/Opposite Parties.

Versus

Shri R. K. Sharma S/o Late Sri Gyan Chand R/o House No.158/1, Sector 45-A, Chandigarh.

……Respondent/Complainant.

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE:

             

             

                                 

Argued by:Sh. Navjinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the             

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

             

“[9] …….Considering all the facts of this case, particularly that the complainant lost an opportunity of having a flat of his own and in view of the escalation of prices in the property/flat/house and the suffering undergone by him all these years due to deficient service of OPs, we allow the complaint and direct the OPs to refund Rs.1,00,000/- (One lakh) as deposited by the complainant and also to pay him compensation to the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- (Five lakh) alongwith Rs.2100/- as cost of litigation. The order shall be complied with within 30 days from the date of its receipt, failing which the decreetal amount shall carry a penal interest @9% per annum from the date of order till its realization.”

2.          

3.          

4.          stst

5.          

6.          st

7.           

8.            

9.          

10.         

11.        

12.        

13.         

14.               

15.        

16.             

17.        

        

      

18.        

19.        

20.          

21. 

22.        

(i)     The appellants/Opposite Parties are directed to refund an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) to the respondent/complainant alongwith interest @9% per annum from the date of deposit, with a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order;

(ii)   The appellants/Opposite Parties are directed to pay an amount of Rs.70,000/- to the respondent/complainant, claimed by him, as compensation for deficiency, in rendering service and causing physical harassment and mental agony to him, instead of Rs.5 Lacs awarded by the District Forum, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order;

(iii)  The appellants/Opposite Parties, are directed to pay an amount of Rs.2,100/- to the respondent/complainant, as cost of litigation, as awarded by the District Forum, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order;

(iv)   This order shall be complied with, by the appellants/Opposite Parties, within the stipulated period, failing which, they shall be liable to pay the amounts, mentioned in Clauses (i) and (ii), above, alongwith interest @12% p.a. from the date of default, till the date of actual payment to the respondent/complainant, besides paying the litigation costs, as aforesaid.

(v)    All other directions given, and reliefs granted by the District Forum, in the impugned order, subject to the modification, aforesaid, which are contrary to, and, in variance of this order, shall stand set aside.

23.        

24.        

Pronounced.

June 09, 2014.

Sd/-

[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

Sd/-

[DEV RAJ]

MEMBER

 

Sd/-

[PADMA PANDEY]

MEMBER

Ad


 

 
 
[ JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.]]
PRESIDENT
 
[ DEV RAJ]
MEMBER
 
[ PADMA PANDEY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.