Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/145/2018

Lion Dates Impex Private Limited - Complainant(s)

Versus

R. Dwaraknath Kandaswamy - Opp.Party(s)

M Vijayanand

29 Dec 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.145 / 2018

(Against the order in C.C. No.76/2015, dated:03.05.2018 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Cuddalore)

                         DATED THE 29^TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

 

 

Lion Dates Impex Private Limited,

Represented by its Authorised Representatitve,

No.27/3, Cauvery Road,

Trichy – 620 002.                                                            .. Appellant / 2^nd Opposite party.

-Versus-

1. R. Dwaraknath Kandaswamy,

S/o. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan,

No.105, Vandipalayam Road,

Thirupathipuliyur,

Cuddalore - 2.

 

R. Dwaraknath Kandaswamy,

Represented by his Authorised Representative

Mr. Nizamudin,

Secretary,

Consumer and Environmental Protection Forum,

Thirupathipuliyur,

Cuddalore - 2.                                                              .. 1^st Respondent / Complainant.

 

2. AGARWAL SWEETS AND BAKERY,

Represented by its Owner,

Sankaran Naidu Street,

Opposite to Register Office,

Thirupathipuliyur,

Cuddalore – 2.                                                          ..  2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party.

 

Counsel for the Appellant / 2^nd Opposite party  : M/s. Vijayanand

1^st Respondent / Complainant                           : Served called absent

2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party                   : Served called absent

          This appeal coming up before us on 29.12.2021 for appearance of appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket order

 

No representation for both. This appeal is posted today for appearance of Appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 11.25 A.M., the Appellant was not present hence, passed over and  called again at 12.40 P.M., then also, the Appellant has not appeared.  Hence keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.   No order as to costs.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT