Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/235/2015

T. Srinivasan - Complainant(s)

Versus

R. Anantha Narayanan - Opp.Party(s)

21 Mar 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/235/2015
( Date of Filing : 17 Aug 2015 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. T. Srinivasan
Thiruvannamalai
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. R. Anantha Narayanan
Chennai
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. S.KARUPPIAH JUDICIAL MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                            BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                 Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

               

 FA. No. 235/2015

(Against the order in C.C. No.211/2012, dated 19.2.2015, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Chennai(North)]

 

                                                                   DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

1.Dr.T.Srinivasan,

2. Dr.M. Padmapriya

Both residing at

No.47, A Big street, Tiruvannamalai                      ..Appellants/complainants

 

                            Vs

 

R.Ananthanarayanan,

No. 888, 10th street,

Syndicate Bank colony,

 Anna Nagar Western Extension,

Chennai 600 101                                                   ..Respondent/opposite party

 

Counsel for the Appellants/complainants       : M/s P.Amarnath

Counsel for the Respondent/opposite party    : M/s V.Balaji   

          This appeal coming on before us for appearance of the appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal, we made the following order in open court :-

                                                                Docket order

          No representation for the appellant. Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

      Sd/-                                                                                                Sd/-

 S.KARUPPIAH                                                                             R.SUBBIAH

JUDL.MEMBER                                                                            PRESIDENT

              

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. S.KARUPPIAH]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.