NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3951/2017

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

PUSHPA DEVI - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SHRESHTH JAIN

17 Jul 2018

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 3950 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 16/05/2017 in Appeal No. 708/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HUDA, SECTOR-6, HUDA COMPLEX,
GURGAON
HARYANA
2. ESTATE OFFICER,
HUDA,
DISTRICT-KAITHAL
HARYANA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. VEENA KUMARI
W/O. SHRI A.K. SARDANA, HOUSE NO. 1, SECTOR 20, URBAN ESTATE
DISTRICT-KAITHAL
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 3951 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 16/05/2017 in Appeal No. 709/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)
WITH
IA/20693/2017(Stay),IA/20694/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HUDA, SECTOR-6, HUDA COMPLEX,
GURGAON
HARYANA
2. ESTATE OFFICER,
HUDA,
DISTRICT-KAITHAL
HARYANA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. PUSHPA DEVI
W/O. SHRI RAM KISHAN SARDANA, R/O. VPO SIWAN,
DISTRICT-KAITHAL
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DINESH SINGH,MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. SHRESHTH JAIN
For the Respondent :
Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate

Dated : 17 Jul 2018
ORDER

 Heard the learned Counsels for the Petitioners and the Respondent.

          In the interest of justice, the impugned Orders dated 16.05.2017 passed in both the Appeal Nos. i.e. 708 and 709 of 2016 respectively by the State Commission are set aside and the Revision Petitions are allowed, subject to payment of a cost of Rs.10,000/- in each case by the Petitioners (Haryana Urban Development Authority) to the Respondents/Complainants in both cases directly in their names respectively by way of ‘a/c payee only’ demand drafts within a period of four weeks from today, with the directions  to the Chief Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula, Haryana to recover the same from the functionary/ies responsible for not attending to these Appeals on the two consecutive dates of hearings before the State Commission, which resulted in both the Appeals being dismissed in default.

         

                                       

          The Chief Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula, Haryana  is also directed to   file a report in compliance as well as a report on the whole episode through counsel before the next date of hearing.

          Parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 10.09.2018.  

 
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DINESH SINGH
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.