| First Appeal No. A/626/2018 | | ( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 2018 ) | | (Arisen out of Order Dated 30/05/2017 in Case No. CC/1613/206 of District Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional) |
| | | | 1. M/s Sanchaya Land & Estates Pvt. Ltd. | | Office at: No.479, HMT Layout, R.T.Nagar, Near R.T.Nagar Bus Depot, Bangalore-560032 Rep. by its Authorisd Signatory Mr.Dastagir Shariff |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Pushkar Pushp | | S/o Dr.Usha Prasad, Aged about 39 years, R/a Flat No.445, B-1, Mahaveer Calyx Apartments, Behind RR layout, Nyanappanahalli, Bangalore-560076 |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
| | First Appeal No. A/627/2018 | | ( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 2018 ) | | (Arisen out of Order Dated 30/05/2017 in Case No. CC/1614/2016 of District Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional) |
| | | | 1. M/s Sanchaya Land & Estates Pvt. Ltd | | Office at: No.479, HMT Layout, R.T.Nagar, Near R.T.Nagar Bus Depot, Bangalore-560032 Rep. by its Authorisd Signatory Mr.Dastagir Shariff |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Varidha Bhargava | | S/o Govind Bhargava, Aged about 36 years, R/a Flat C-702, Mantri Tranquil, Gubbaalala post, Opp. Kanakarapura road, Bangalore-560061 |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
| | First Appeal No. A/628/2018 | | ( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 2018 ) | | (Arisen out of Order Dated 30/05/2017 in Case No. CC/1612/2016 of District Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional) |
| | | | 1. M/s Sanchaya Land & Estates Pvt. Ltd | | Office at: No.479, HMT Layout, R.T.Nagar, Near R.T.Nagar Bus Depot, Bangalore-560032 Rep. by its Authorisd Signatory Mr.Dastagir Shariff |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Kaushik.M.S. | | S/o Meenakshi Sundaram, Aged about 37 years, Flat No.4, Dev Apartment No.2, Bhaktavatsala Nagar, First street, Adyar, Chennai-600020 |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | A-626/2018 22-8-2024 ORDER BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER. Case called out twice, Appellant not present since long time. The appeal was filed long back in the year 2018. On perusal of the order sheet, it is seen that in spite of sufficient opportunities given to the appellant to address the arguments, he did not turn up to address the arguments. It seems, he has no interest in continuing his case. Mere filing of memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant. We do not find any valid reasons to adjourn the matter. As such the appeal is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Lady Member. Judicial Member | |
