Delhi

StateCommission

A/12/40

VINOD KR. GANDHI - Complainant(s)

Versus

PURI CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

17 Jul 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/12/40
(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/10/2011 in Case No. 996/09 of District New Delhi)
 
1. VINOD KR. GANDHI
197 STATE BANK NAGAR, PASCHIM VIHAR, ND-63
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. PURI CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
1208-1210 SURYA KIRAN BUILDING 19 K.G MARG CP ND-1
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

                      Date of Decision:  17.7.2014

                                                                                           

First Appeal NO. 40/2012

 

 

Vinod Kumar Gandhi

S/o Late Sh. R.S. Gandhi,

R/o 197, State Bank Nagar,

Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-63

 

 

     .........Appellant

VS

 

 

 

Puri Constructions Pvt. Ltd.,

1208-1210 Surya Kiran Building,

19 K.G. Marg, Connaught Place,

New Delhi-110 001

Through competent Authorized Director/Manager/Officer

 

 

………...Respondent       

 

CORAM

SALMA NOOR, MEMBER

N P KAUSHIK, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

          Appeal is directed against the order dated 4.7.2011 passed by the District Forum-VI, M Block, Vikas Bhawan, IP Estate, New Delhi in complaint case No.996/09.

          In brief, the complainant/appellant booked a residential plot with the OP and paid an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- as booking amount.  The complainant/appellant was allotted a plot on 9th floor bearing No.C-2/902.  The complainant/appellant did not like the allotment on the 9th floor.  He asked for a change of the floor.  After receiving no response from the OP, he opted out of the purchase and demanded the refund of the money.  The OP after deducting 10% of the booking amount refunded an amount of Rs.4,50,000/- to the complainant.  The terms and conditions relating to the deduction of 10% of the booking amount are contained in clause 14 and 15 of the Agreement dated 28.12.2007.  There is no dispute on the terms and conditions of the Agreement.    The only contention put forth by the complainant/appellant is that there is no allotment in the eyes of law as he had not signed any Agreement.  The complainant/appellant has taken us through a letter dated 26.2.2008 referring to a copy of the Agreement being sent along with the letter.  Admittedly, the said letter is a copy of the Agreement produced before us by the Complainant/Appellant.  The OP has deducted 10% of the booking amount when the complainant/appellant chose to opt out of the deal. The appeal is, therefore, devoid of merits.  The same is  hence dismissed.

       

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.